Page 80 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 80

54   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   FUNDAMENTALS OF ADSORPTION            55

           cally  unrealistic overhanging  profile  s!wtched  m  the ·figure.  In  fact  this  does
 Simple  Wove  (o)   not  occur;  wJ1en  cauilibnum  theory  predicts  an  overhanging  profile  tl1e
           contrnuous  soiut1on  JS  m  fact  reoiaced  by  the  corresponding  shock,  which
 0         travels with  a velocity ( w') dictated  by  a  mass  balance over  the  trans1t1on:
 ~
 u
 uf            w; - v/[ 1 + (Y) ~:• ]                                ( 2.52)
             If the isotherm  has an  inflexmn  oomt (e.g., a  type  II  isotherm),  It  may  be
 C/c.
           regarded  as  a  combination  of  "favorable."  and  ".unfavorable··  segments.
 ,         Equilibrium theory then  predicts  that the  asymptotic  form  of the  concentra-
 Shock   ,  I   (bl
 qiq.   ,  ,   tmn  profile  will  be  a  compos1ie  wave  cons1stmg  of  a  shock  front  with  a
 ,  ,      prooort1onate  pattern  wave  or  a  proportionate  pattern  wave  followed  by  a
 •
 u   ,  't3   shock lsee  Figure 2.23(c)l.
 u   ,  ,    Another  s1tuat1on  m  which  a  shock  solution  1s  ·obtained  ansc . ..,  in  hulk
 r,:f   I   seoarat1ons,  where  the  change  m  flow  rate  due  to  adsorotmn  1s  rclat1vc1v
 ;
           large.  For a bulk separation we  have  in place of Eq,, 2.48:
                                 ('  l  -
                                      1c  ')  iJij
                ac
                       iJ o
               v- + c- +  - ilc   +  -- -:-- =  0                    (2.53)
                az     dz   <Jt     e   ilt
           where,  for  an  isobaric  system  with  an  adsorbable  component  m  an  Inert
           earner:
                V    1   - Yo
                Vo   T=v                                             (2.54)
           Expressed  m  terms  of  the  mole  fract10n  of  the  adsorbable  (or  more  ad~
           sorbable) component, Eq.  2.53  becomes.  for  a  linear equilibnum system:
               {vo(l  - Y 0 )/(I -y)'f 1 +  ( ~; ")K]} ~~ +  ~;  =  n   (2.55)
 Figure 2.23  Dcveloomem of the conccntralion  profile  m an adsorpi1on column with
 negligible  mass  transfer resistance. (a)  For an  "unfavorable" equilibrmm relationship   which  evidently  represents  a traveling wave  with  the  wave  veiocitv  given  bv:
 the  profile  spreads as  1t  propagates, approaching proponionate  pattern  behavior. (b)
 For a  "favorable" equilibnum  relat10nship an  mitially dispersed  profile  1s  sharpened   :'."..  = {(1  -yn)/(1 -y) [1  + (~ )K]}
                                     2
 as  1t  propagates,  approaching  a  shock  wave.  (c)  For  a  BET-type  1soltlerm  the   (2.56)
 asymptotic form  1s  a combinat1on of a shock and  a proportmnate pattern wave.   Vo   _   L   £   ·'
           Clearly  w  mcreases with  mcreasmg  y,  Just  as  m  the  case  of a  trace  sy5item
           with  favorable  equilibrium,  so  that,  according  to  eouilibnum  theory,  there
 soreads  as  it  prooagates fFigure  2.23(a)].  Since  the  profile  spreads  111  direct   will  be a shock transition.
 orooortwn  to  the  distance  traveled,  this  is  referred  to  as  "orooortionate
 pattern··  behavior.
             2.4.2  Asymptotic  Behav10r:  Effect  of Mass  Transfer  ReSistance
 The  case  of  a  favorable  cauilibnum  isotherm  is  slightly  more  comoiex.
                   and Axial Dispersion
 tla* /de  decreases  with  concentratmn;  so.  according  to  Eo.  2.49;  w  will
 mcrease  with  concentration.  This  leads  to what  1s  commonly  referred  to  as   When the isotherm is of unfavorable form,  mass transfer resistance and axial
 "self-sharoemng"  behavior.  An  m1tially  dispersed  profile  will  become  les_s   dispersion  have  only  a  relatively minor  effect  on  the  asvmotot1c  form  of the
 and  less  dispersed as 1t  propagates [Figure 2.23(b)],  eventually approaching a   concentration profile, This may be understood from  Figure 2.24, which shows
 shock  transition.  Eauation  2.50  predicts  that  the  sharpening  of  the. profile   the qualitative form of the concentration orofiles m a column followmg a step
 would  continue,  even  beyond  the  rectangular sI1ock  form,  to give  the ohys1-  change m  concentrations at the mlet.  Because the  isotherm  1s  of unfavorable
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85