Page 188 - Principles and Applications of NanoMEMS Physics
P. 188

176                                                     Chapter 4


               Constructing a pseudo-pure state makes use of the concept of deviation
             density matrix. This is the arbitrary matrix  δ  for which  −δ  ρ  =  I λ  for some
             constant  λ . From this definition, and inspection of Eq. (29), it is clear that
             the matrix  0ε  0  is in fact a deviation matrix from the equilibrium state of

             one nuclear spin. An interesting property of the deviation matrix is that, if
             m ˆ  is a traceless operator, then [193],
                                 m
               tr ( ) ˆ =δ m  ( ( tr ρ +  I λ  ) ) ˆ
                     =  tr ( ) trm ˆ +ρ  ( ) ˆ .                                                                       (33)
                                 m
                     =  tr ρ m
                        ( ) ˆ

             Thus, the expectation value (the measurement) of a traceless observable may
             be obtained either from the density matrix or from the deviation matrix, as
             prescribed in Eq. (33). A pseudo-pure state, in fact, is defined as one whose
             equilibrium  state has the deviation  δ  =  ε  0  0 . Its  significance is  as

             follows. If we are interested in the probability of  p  of measuring state  1 ,
                                                         1
             given that the initial state was  0 , then this is given by [193],

               p =  1  U  0  0  U +  1
                 1
                  =  tr ( 0U  0  U +  1  1 )


                  =  tr ( 0U  0  U + (I σ−  z  )) 2/  ,                                     (34)

                  =  tr ( ( U  0  0  U  +  ) ( 0Utr−  0  U σ  z  )) 2/
                                               +
                                   +
                  =  ( 1−  tr ( 0U  0  U σ  )) 2/
                                     z

             Where U is the total unitary operator associated with  a  computation.
             Therefore,  Eq. (34) indicates that by measuring the initial and  final
             expectation    values     of     ı ,      a =  tr (įı  ) İ= ,  and
                                                z               z
                                       +
              ′ a  = tr ( ′ıį  ) = İtr ( 0U  0  U σ  ), respectively, one can determine   p . In
                       z                 z                                1
             fact,  p =  (1− ( aa ′ )) 2 , independent of the scale İ .
                  1
               Most importantly, the technique may be extended to the case in which one
             desires to determine the probability  p  of measuring the state  1 , in the
                                              1                        1
             case in which this state  refers to the first qubic  resulting from applying  a
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193