Page 124 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 124

Multiphysics                      111

          Now pull down the Subdomain menu and select Subdomain settings.


                Subdomain Mode
                       Select domain 1
                    0   Use the multiphysics pull down menu to select the IC NS mode
                    0   Set p=l;  q=1; F,=O; F,=-l
                    0   Use the multiphysics pull down menu to select the CC mode
                       Set p=1; ~=l; c=l; u=u; v=v
                        Select the init tab; set T(tO)=TO+(Tl-TO)*x
                       Use the multiphysics pull down menu to select the coeff mode

                    0   Set c=l; da=O; f=vx-uy
                       Apply
                    0   OK
          Now  pull  down the  Mesh menu  and  select  the  Parameters option.  We will
          need to pack elements into the corners for best resolution.

                Mesh Parameters
                       Select more>>
                       Max element size near vertices:  1 0.05 2 0.05 3 0.05 4 0.05
                    0   Remesh
                       OK
                    0
          There should be 792 elements.  Click on the  = button on the toolbar  to  Solve.
          Now plot the temperature profile.  Is it what you expected? How does it compare
          with the initial condition.
             Now plot the streamfunction.  Surprised by the complexity?  Now look at the
          scale.  Why  so  small?  Recall  that  we  set  F,=-1 (gravity  is  in  the  negative  y
          direction).  This has the effect of adding hydrostatic pressure only.  So there is no
          back  action  on  the  momentum  equation  from  the  imposed  differential  sidewall
          temperatures.  So what we have here is a plot of velocity noise generated by round-
          off error.  It is always important  to look  at the  scale  of  contoudsurface  plots  to
          assess whether we are interpreting noise!
             You may have had some difficulty getting FEMLAB to converge to a solution.
          When I originally wrote this example in FEMLAB 2.2, it converged fairly rapidly.
          Yet  when  done  with  FEMLAB  2.3,  it  took  a  long  time.   There  are  two
          contributions  to the slow convergence - (1) the new  scaling feature for the error
          estimate under the Solver Parameters, and (2) the lack of a pressure datum point.
          The  first  (scaling  factor)  was  unexpected.  Basically,  FEMLAB  hopes  to  aid
          convergence by scaling each contribution to the error automatically.  But since our
          velocity field has the true solution of a zero velocity field, numerically we find the
          approximate solution as noise around zero.  The automatic scaling feature is trying
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129