Page 27 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 27

14         Process Modelling and Simulation with Finite Element Methods

         of  the  equations  is “hard-wired”  in, and  only  the  coefficients  are  specified  in
         subdomain mode.
            Figure  0.13  shows  the  Subdomain Settings dialogue  box  for  domain  1.
         The  upper  left  comer  shows  the  equation(s)  that  are  hard-wired  into  this
         application  mode.  The  entry  boxes  are for  the  coefficients  in  the  equations,
         which  can be specified  as constants,  expressions  involving  other  dependent  or
         independent  variables,  or even  MATLAB  m-file  functions.  The  generality  of
         “user defined programming”  for just coefficients in pre-built  application  modes
         is impressive.
            Figure  0.14  shows  the  Mesh mode  with  the  mesh  set  up  for  the  saved
         solution here.  Mesh mode, Solve mode, and  Post mode are the places where
         the solution methodology are specified.  But up to this point, we have specified a
         complete  FEM model  analytically.  Mesh,  Solve,  and  Post modes  are about
         numerics,  and  to  demonstrate  these  well  takes  a  whole  chapter,  and  is  done
         simply in Chapter one.
            Just  hitting  the  Solve  button  (=)  on  the  toolbar,  however,  gives  us  the
         solution with this  mesh and the default numerical  solution  settings.  Post mode
         (Figure  0.3)  shows  the  color  density  plot  of  the  surface  velocity  U  for  the
         conditions specified.
            I  doubt  we  are any  the  wiser  about  turbulence  from this  tour,  but  we  now
         know  the  steps  necessary  to  specify  a  model  analytically.  In  subsequent
         chapters, these steps are referred to, and they are equivalent to specifying a PDE
         or FEM model completely.  The k-E model and geometry specified here are both
         advanced models.  Invariably, novice users wish to jump in at the deep end with
         the  greatest  model  complexity  all  at  once.  In  this  book, we  do precisely  the
         opposite.  The reductionist  approach  is adopted in  Chapter  one and  two  with
         surgical precision,  where  we introduce the basics  with  even simpler  steps than
         envisaged by the creators of FEMLAB.  Why?  Because  you  do need  to crawl
         before  you  can run,  even if  in other  circumstances  you  are already  a  sprinter.
         The difficulty with complex computer packages is uncertainty  on the part of the
         user about  what  the package  does.  So to  remove  the  mystery,  we  start  simple
         and build up capability with exact certainty about what we are asking FEMLAB
         to do.

         0.2.2  Why the tour of  k-E model of a turbulent static mixer?
          Clearly,  since  we  learned  rather  little  about  turbulence  from  this  tour  of  the
         turbulent static mixer entry in the Model Library, there is a different reason for
         the tour  itself. The rationale  for showing  these features  of FEMLAB is to give
         the non-FEMLAB  initiated reader some flavor of how the FEMLAB GUI is laid
         out  and  how  the  data  entry  is  organized.  The  actual  intellectual  content  of
         models can be explained without the reader  knowing the layout, but the reading
         experience would be more theoretically useful than practical.  For this reason, if
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32