Page 352 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 352

Electrokinetic Flow                 339


          The algebraic relations hold roughly for the electric potential, pressure, current,
          and  velocity,  for  instance:  u,  =L=0.790828.   Some  are  spot  on  --
                                       Jz
          -- '-" 0-7S213  = -1.2535 . In general, the electric potential conditions hold
               -
           A%       6
          exceedingly  well,  but  the  velocity  field/pressure  fields  do  not  hold  as  well.
          Again, this is a strong indicator that the solution is not mesh resolved.
             Plot  (see  Figure  9.9)  and  Animate  the  solution.   The  animation  shows
          clearly how the front evolves to set up a fully developed upper flow, bypassing
          the lower leg. The intermediate voltage in the "b-leg"  of the Y-junction tends to
          hold back the flow of species Y=l from the merging into the main flow along the
          (a)-(c)  open switch  - only  slow diffusion  out and  in,  along  with  some modest
          convection,  occur.  With  concentration  dependent conductivity  (and  viscosity
          [2]), it  is possible to  counteract  the  diffusion  to  some extent  which  sharpens
          some fronts.

          B. Alternation between voltages

          Now for this application to be a Y-junction switch, we need to be able to replace
          the  constant  voltages  $a  and  $b  with   and  $b(t), respectively.  The signals
          could be arbitrary, however, in practice they are discontinuous level adjustments,
          which  can be idealized  as  a  square  wave.  A  suitable choice is the  alternation
          between values do and  Qbb0 (PHIA and PHIB), with the signals 90" out of phase.
          We coded the square wave in coupling variables in two different ways:

          Bl. Logical functions
          Under AddEdit Coupling Variables, we made the following changes:
          switching
          Qa
          zetal* (PHIA-PHIA* (sin(Z*pi*t) <O) +PHIB* (sin(Z*pi*t) c0) -volts) /
          dsa-Re*(PA-bara)/f/dsa
          Qb
          zetal*(PHIB-PHIB*(sin(Z*pi*t)<O)+PHIA*(Sin(Z*pi*t)~O) -voltb)/
          dsb-Re*(PB-barb)/f/dsb
          Ia
          sigr* (PHIA-PHIA* (sin(2*pi*t)
                                     <O) tPHIB* (sin(2*pi*t) <O) -volts) /dsa
          Ib
          sigr* (PHIB-PHIB* (sin(2*pi*t)  +PHIA* (sin(Z*pi*t) <O)  -voltb) /dsb
                                     <O)
          The logical  statement  (sin(Z*pi*t) <o)takes the  value  of  1 when  true  (during
          the second half  period)  and 0 when false (during the first half period),  which is
          the essence of the  square wave that makes a discontinuous  switch.  It is easy to
          code.  We substituted this code into the above FEMLAB model without success.
          The numerical analysis proceeds smoothly until the end of the first half period, at
   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357