Page 349 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 349

336        Process Modelling and Simulation with Finite Element Methods

          menu and select Boundary Settings.  In parallel with the previous set up, make
         the following assignments:


            Boundary Mode I Boundary Settings

            bnd 1             bnd 3             bnd 9     bnd 2,4,5,6,7,8
            u=0.707 107*Qb    u=0.707 107*Qa     u=Qc     unchanged
            v=0.707107*Qb     v=-0.707107*Qa     v=o
                   species mode: unchanged
                   potential mode
            bnd 1        I  bnd3        I  bnd9       I  bnd 2,4,5,6,7,8
            Neumann      I  Neumann     I  Neumann    1  unchanged
           I  G=Ib/sigr   I  G=Ia/sigr   I  G=Ic/sigr
                   ADDIv/OK
                0
         There is an underlying assumption in the above formulation.  Use of a uniform
         velocity  at  each  flow  boundary  is  only  possible  if  pressure  gradient  can  be
         neglected.  In  'pure'  electrokinetic  flow,  that  is  where  conductivity,  zeta
         potential, viscosity  are each uniform,  the approximation of  uniform  velocity  at
         the flow boundaries is excellent.  The total pressure in each reservoir  must also
         be the same (Cummings et al., 2000).  However, when liquid properties are not
         uniform  or a  differential  of  dynamics  pressure  between  reservoirs  is  present,
         pressure  gradients  arise within  the network  and  the  assumption  implicit in  the
         above  treatment that  velocity  is  uniform  at  each  boundary  is not  appropriate.
         The generally  correct treatment  would be  to determine I  and  Q from the flow
         boundaries  and use  relation  9.11 for the  uniform pressure  and potential  at the
         boundary.  That  pressure  or  potential  are  uniform  at  each  boundary  follows
         rigorously when the boundary is at a position where the flow is developed, that is
         sufficiently  far  (say,  a  channel  width)  from  a  disturbance  region  such  as  a
         junction.
             The  formulation  used  does  avoid  the  need  for  further  weak  boundary
         constraint modes - only wcu and wcv are needed.  Although there is an analogy
         between pressure and electric potential, current and velocity, these quantities are
         treated  fundamentally  differently  with  regard  to  the  need  for  weak  boundary
         constraints.  The  velocity  boundary  conditions  now  require  weak  boundary
         constraints on  all boundaries  (not just the wall  surfaces).  So we will  need  to
         alter the Boundary Settings for wcu and wcv to include all boundaries.  This is
         because  velocities  are  implemented  as  Dirichlet  boundary  conditions.  The
         Neumann BCs for the current in potential mode, however, do not require and are
         incompatible with  weak boundary  constraints as we learned earlier.  Neumann
         conditions,  since they  are the default for FEM, are non-constraints  even when
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354