Page 166 - Purchasing Power Black Kids and American Consumer Culture
P. 166

Ethnically Corned Dolls  .  151

          For minority toymakers  attempting  to refashion the racial diversity
       on  the  shelves of a large retailer  like Toys-R-Us or  Target, their  task is
       convincing these  eight-hundred-pound  gorillas that ethnically correct
       toys can make money, not that stocking their stores with  a multicultural
       array of toys is the  socially progressive thing to  do.  Toys-R-Us has been
       very supportive  of up-and-coming  manufacturers  of ethnically correct
       toys,  notably  Olmec and Playmates, but this support  has a  conspicuous
       connection  to  sales and  profits. Once those  profits  began to  seem  solid,
       large toymakers  decided to enter the market,  a potential  blow to  Olmec
       and a fatal one to Shindana. Hasbro, Kenner, Tyco, and Mattel  have sig-
       nificantly greater resources than the smaller, minority-owned  companies.
       During the 1980s Hasbro stock was the best performer not just in the toy
       business but  in the entire market.  By the early 1990s Hasbro was the
       largest toy company in the world, having acquired Playskool and Milton
       Bradley. In comparison,  Olmec's  $2.9  million in sales was  a drop  in the
       barrel of monkeys. In a move that at  once allowed  Olmec  to retain its
       corporate identity and Hasbro to demonstrate  its progressiveness,  the
       two companies  entered  into  a cooperation  agreement,  with  Hasbro  pro-
       viding  Olmec with  financial,  marketing,  and  technical  assistance while
       also developing its own lines of ethnically correct toys.
          Mattel launched its much-vaunted Shani doll in 1991;  during the  1992
       Christmas  season  Toys-R-Us was  quietly and cautiously  test-marketing
       ethnically correct  dolls  in Atlanta  and  Philadelphia.  Toymakers  who
       could not rely on the sell-appeal of the Barbie connection held their collec-
       tive breath: it was  only with  the cooperation  and  backing  of Toys-R-Us
       that  they could  confidently  sink the huge sums required  into launching
       ethnically correct  lines of toys and  dolls.  In February 1993  the  numbers
       looked  good  enough  for Ebony  magazine to  sponsor  a special seminar
       on  "Black Toys for Play and  Pride" at  the New  York International Toy
       Fair. All the major  toymakers—Mattel, Hasbro, Kenner, and  Tyco—
       rushed  a variety of  lines to  market,  and  Toys-R-Us  hired  the  Mingo
       Group,  the nation's largest minority-owned advertising agency, to launch
       a marketing campaign aimed at African American consumers. With these
       great  successes, these  large retailers and producers  were touting  the eth-
       nically correct  doll  as  a sign of their  dedication  to  democratic  values
       while collectively patting themselves on their backs for the success of this
       new  niche-market.
         Unfortunately, a toy shelf stocked  with ethnically correct  merchandise
       does not  necessarily lead to the same thing  in children's  toyboxes.  This
       was certainly the case in Newhallville, where only a couple of the children
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171