Page 570 - Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts
P. 570

Comparative life-cycle analysis of synthetic detergents and biosurfactants—an overview  519

           Acknowledgment


           Raveendran Sindhu acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology for sanctioning
           a project under DST WOS-B scheme.




           References

           Adlercreutz, D., et al., 2010. Alkanolamide biosurfactants: techno-economic evaluation of
               biocatalytic versus chemical production. Ind. Biotechnol. 6 (4), 204 211.
           Aru, O.O., Onwurah, I.N., 2018. Life cycle assessment of the environmental impact of bio-
               surfactant production from oil waste by a diculture of Azotobacter vinelandii and
               Pseudomonas sp. J. Bioremediat. Biodegrad. 9, 435.
           Azizullah, A., et al., 2012. Chronic toxicity of a laundry detergent to the freshwater flagellate
               Euglena gracilis. Ecotoxicology 1 8.
           Baccile, N., et al., 2016. Development of a cradle-to-grave approach for acetylated acidic
               sophorolipid biosurfactants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (1), 1186 1198.
           Bandala, E.R., Velasco, Y., Torres, L.G., 2008. Decontamination of soil washing wastewater
               using solar driven advanced oxidation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 160 (2 3),
               402 407.
           Cserhati, T., Forgacs, E., Oros, G., 2002. Biological activity and environmental impact of
               anionic surfactants. Environ. Int. 28 (5), 337 348.
           Cullen, J.M., Allwood, J.M., 2009. The role of washing machines in life cycle assessment
               studies: the dangers of using LCA for prioritization. J. Ind. Ecol. 13 (1), 27 37.
           Curran, M.A., 2014. Strengths and limitations of life cycle assessment. Background and
               Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, pp. 189 206.
           Curran, M.A., 2017. Overview of goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Goal
               and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, pp. 1 62.
           DEAT, 2004. Life Cycle Assessment, Integrated Environmental Management, in:
               Information Series 9, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT),
               Pretoria.
           Enomoto, R., et al., 2007. Cationic surfactants induce apoptosis in normal and cancer cells.
               Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1095 (1), 1 6.
           European Union, Framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and
               indicators, in: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook, first
               ed., European Union, Luxembourg, 2010.
           Fawer, M., Postlethwaite, D., Klu ¨ppel, H.-J., 1998. Life cycle inventory for the production of
               zeolite a for detergents. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 3 (2), 71 74.
           M. Finkbeiner, R. Tan, M. Raimbault. Life cycle assessment (ISO 14040/44)as basis for envi-
               ronmental declarations and carbon footprint of products, in: ISO Technical Committee
               207 Workshop, Norway, 2011.
           Finnveden, G., 2000. On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems
               analysis tools in general. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 5 (4), 229.
           Forman, G.S., Hauser, A.B., Adda, S.M., 2014. Life cycle analysis of gas to liquids (GTL)
               derived linear alkyl benzene. J. Cleaner Prod. 80, 30 37.
           Frischknecht, R., Krewitt, W., 2007. Meeting the NEEDS of European environmental sustain-
               ability assessment. Energy 3, 4.
   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575