Page 141 - Reservoir Geomechanics
P. 141

124    Reservoir geomechanics


                Because of his extensive research on friction (Coulomb 1773), equation (4.39)is
              sometimes referred to as the Coulomb criterion. One can define the Coulomb failure
              function (CFF) as
                                                                                 (4.40)
              CFF = τ − µσ n
              When the Coulomb failure function is negative, a fault is stable as the shear stress is
              insufficient to overcome the resistance to sliding, µσ n .However, as CFF approaches
              zero, frictional sliding will occur on a pre-existing fault plane as there is sufficient shear
              stress to overcome the effective normal stress on the fault plane. Again, the CFF in this
              manner presupposes that the cohesive strength of a fault is very small compared to the
              shear and normal stresses acting upon it. As will be illustrated below, this assumption
              appears to be quite reasonable.
                As mentioned above, equation (4.39) predicts that raising pore pressure would tend
              to de-stabilize faults and encourage slip to take place by raising the ratio of shear to
              normal stress on any pre-existing fault. While there have been many examples of seis-
              micity apparently induced by fluid injection in oil fields (see the review by Grasso
              1992), two experiments in the 1960s and 1970s in Colorado first drew attention to this
              phenomenon (Figure 4.22) and provided implicit support for the applicability of Amon-
              tons’ law/Coulomb failure to crustal faulting. A consulting geologist in Denver named
              David Evans pointed out an apparent correlation between the number of earthquakes
              occurring at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal and the volume of waste fluid being injected
              into the fractured basement rocks at 3.7 km depth. Subsequently, Healy, Rubey et al.
              (1968) showed there to be a close correlation between the downhole pressure during
              injection and the number of earthquakes (Figure 4.22a). The focal mechanisms of the
              earthquakes were later shown to be normal faulting events. This enabled Zoback and
              Healy (1984)to demonstrate that the magnitudes of the vertical stress, least principal
              stress and pore pressure during injection were such that equation (4.39)was satisfied
              and induced seismicity was to be expected for a coefficient of friction of about 0.6 (see
              below). A similar study was carried out only a few years later at Rangeley, Colorado
              (Figure 4.22b) where water was being injected at high pressure in an attempt to improve
              production from the extremely low permeability Weber sandstone (Raleigh, Healy
              et al. 1976). In this case, it could be seen that a downhole pressure of 3700 psi (25.5
              MPa) was required to induce slip on pre-existing faults in the area, as predicted by
              equation (4.39) (Zoback and Healy 1984).
                As mentioned above, friction is a material property of a fault and Byerlee (1978)
              summarized numerous laboratory experiments on a wide variety of faults in different
              types of rock. He considered natural faults in rock, faults induced in triaxial compression
              tests and artificial faults (i.e. sawcuts in rock) of different roughness. His work (and that
              of many others) is summarized in Figure 4.23 (modified from Byerlee 1978). Note that
              for an extremely wide variety of rock types, Byerlee showed that at elevated effective
              normal stress (≥∼10 MPa), friction on faults is independent of surface roughness,
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146