Page 268 - Reservoir Geomechanics
P. 268

249    Wellbore failure and stress determination in deviated wells



        a.   Horizontal distance west (m)  Deviation from vertical (deg)  b.
          500  400  300  200  100  0  0  10  20  30  40  50
                               2600

                               2700
                                                      S
                               2800                    Hmax

                               2900

                               3000
                               3100

                               3200
                                                                 5   10  15  20
                               3300                                  P
                              TVD (m)


               Figure 8.9. Drilling-induced tensile fractures were observed in the near-vertical portion of a well in
               the Visund field in the northern North Sea which abruptly ceased when the well deviated more than
               35 (center). As shown in the figure on the right, this result is predicted by the stress state shown in
                ◦
               Figure 8.10 (after Wiprut, Zoback et al. 2000). Reprinted with permission of Elsevier.

               an azimuth of N80 W (Figure 8.9a). Numerous drilling-induced tensile fractures were
                              ◦
               observed in the near-vertical section of this well and in other near-vertical wells in the
               field. The depth interval over which the fractures are observed is shown in red. Note that
               the occurrence of drilling-induced tensile fractures stops abruptly at a measured depth
               of ∼2860 m, or equivalently, when the deviation of the well reached 35 . Electrical
                                                                            ◦
               image data quality was excellent in all sections of the well. Hence, the disappearance
               of the fractures was not the result of poor data quality. In addition, there was no marked
               change in drilling procedure, mud weights, etc. such that disappearance of the fractures
               with depth does not appear to be due to a change in drilling procedures.
                 In a manner similar to that illustrated for vertical wells in Figure 7.10,itis possible
               to constrain the magnitude of S Hmax after taking into account the ECD and thermal
               perturbation of the wellbore stress concentration as accurately as possible. The vertical
               stress, pore pressure and magnitude of least principal stress (from leak-off test data) for
               theVisund field were presented in Figure 7.4. Careful note was taken where bit trips and
               wash and ream operations may have perturbed the mud pressure in the well at given
               depths (Figure 7.12). As illustrated in Figure 8.10, the heavy black line indicates the
               magnitude of S Hmax as a function of S hmin to cause drilling-induced tensile fractures
               in a well with the appropriate deviation, ECD and amount of cooling. Because of this
               well’s deviation, the line that defines the magnitude of S Hmax required to explain the
               occurrence of drilling-induced tensile fractures is no longer nearly coincident with the
               strike-slip faulting condition as was the case for vertical wells as illustrated in Chapter 7.
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273