Page 23 - Root Cause Failure Analysis
P. 23

3





                   ROOT CAUSE FAILURE

                   ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY



                   RCFA is a logical sequence of steps that leads the investigator through the process of
                   isolating the facts surrounding an event or failure. Once the problem has been  fully
                   defined, the analysis systematically determines the best course of action that will resolve
                   the event and assure that it is not repeated. Because of the cost associated with perform-
                   ing such an analysis, care should be exercised before an investigation is undertaken.

                   The first step in this process is obtaining a clear definition of the potential problem or
                   event. The logic tree illustrated in Figure 3-1  should be followed for the initial phase
                   of the evaluation.


                   REPORTING  AN INCIDENT OR  PROBLEM
                   The investigator seldom is present when an incident or problem occurs. Therefore, the
                   first step is the initial notification that an incident or problem has taken place. Typi-
                   cally, this report will be verbal, a brief written note, or a notation in the production log
                   book. In most cases, the communication will not contain a complete description of the
                   problem.  Rather,  it  will  be  a  very  brief  description of  the  perceived  symptoms
                   observed by the person reporting the problem.

                   Symptoms and Boundaries
                  The most effective means of problem or event definition is to determine its real symp-
                   toms and establish limits that bound the event. At this stage of the investigation, the task
                   can be accomplished by an interview with the person who first observed the problem.

                   Perceived Causes of Problem
                  At this point, each person interviewed will have a definite opinion about the incident, and
                   will have his or her description of the event and an absolute reason for the occurrence. In

                   14
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28