Page 105 - Science at the nanoscale
P. 105

RPS: PSP0007 - Science-at-Nanoscale
                             9:10
                   June 9, 2009
                             surface of the solid material:
                                                         δG
                                                                             5.1. Surface Energy  95  ch05
                                                   γ =                             (5.1)
                                                         δA   T,P
                                                G = Gibbs free energy
                                                  A = Surface area
                               Apparently, some bonds have been broken in creating this new
                             surface. Extensive model calculations using such “broken-bond”
                             models have been performed for a variety of crystal planes and
                             structures 1
                               We have learnt in Section 4.3 that atoms are arranged differently
                             on different crystal planes. In the following, we use a simplified
                             version of the “broken-bond model” to illustrate that different
                             crystal planes have different surface energies. By ignoring the
                             interactions of higher order neighbours, we estimate γ as half of ε,
                             the bond strength, multiplying with the number of broken bonds
                             (N ):
                               b
                                                         1
                                                    γ =   N ερ a                   (5.2)
                                                           b
                                                         2
                                 ρ a = number of atoms per unit area on the new surface
                               This model is obviously oversimplified since it assumes that the
                             bond strength is the same throughout the whole crystal structure,
                             and is similar for both surface and bulk atoms. The former may be
                             true in the case of elemental metallic crystals composed of just one
                             type of atoms. In a simple picture, let us consider cutting away
                             one unit cell along the {100} facet of a fcc metallic solid (Fig. 5.2).
                             Since each atom on the “new” {100} surface is left with 8 coor-
                             dinating neighbours, it is clear that four bonds have been broken
                                          2
                             and γ = (4ε)/a according to Eq. 5.2.
                               A similar schematic can be drawn for the {111} surface to show
                                                                 √
                                                                       2
                             that three bonds are broken and γ = (2ε 3)/a . Thus, this sim-
                             plified model allows us to see that different crystal facets possess
                             different surface energies. Broken-bond model calculations that
                             take into account second and higher order interactions predict
                             that γ    < γ      < γ     for fcc metals. 1  Generally, it was
                                  (111)    (100)    (110)
                             found that crystal surfaces with lower Miller indices have a lower
                             surface energy than those with higher Miller indices. Commonly


                             1  S. G. Wang, E. K. Tian and C. W. Lung, J. Phys. and Chem. Solids, 61, 1295 (2000).
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110