Page 387 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 387

362    HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN MOTION PLANNING

           TABLE 7.6. Results of Mann–Whitney Test on the Interface Factor for LtoR Task
             Mann–Whitney Test  Variable: Interface (LtoR only). Group 1: Virt; Group 2: Phys
                                   Rank Sum                          Valid N
             Variable            Virt    Phys       U      p-Level  Virt  Phys
             Path length       2943.000  1617.000  489.0000  0.000002  48  47


           TABLE 7.7. Results of Mann–Whitney Test on the Interface Factor for the RtoL
           Task
             Mann–Whitney Test   Variable: Interface (RtoL). Group 1: Virt; Group 2: Phys
                                   Rank Sum                           Valid N
             Variable            Virt     Phys      U       p-Level  virt  phys
             Path length       2505.000  2055.000  927.0000  0.134619  48  47



           the virtual group data and the physical group data. This result agrees with the
           results above obtained for the combined LtoR and RtoL data.
              5. Here the Mann–Whitney U-test measures the effect of the interface fac-
           tor using only the right-to-left (RtoL) task data sets. The results are shown in
           Table 7.7. Given the significance level p> 0.01, we accept the null hypothesis
           and thus conclude that in this more difficult motion planning task there is no sta-
           tistically significant difference between the subjects’ performance when moving
           the virtual arm and when moving the physical arm.
              The last three test results (3, 4, and 5) imply a complex relationship between
           the subjects’ performance and the type of interface used in the test. This points to
           a possibility of an interaction effect between the interface factor and the direction-
           of-motion factor. To clarify this issue, we turn in the next section to analysis of
           variance of sample data.

           7.4.3 Univariate Analysis of Variance

           Assumptions. The purpose of analysis of variance (ANOVA), which is also
           the name of the technique that serves this purpose, is to probe the data for
           significant differences between the means of sets of data, with the number of sets
           being at least two. The technique performs a statistical test of comparing variances
           (hence the name). This objective is very similar to the objective of nonparametric
           analysis above, except that ANOVA can sometimes be more sensitive. In addition,
           besides testing individual effects of independent variables, ANOVA can also test
           for interaction effects between variables.
              To apply the analysis of variance, we need some assumptions about the data.
           As before, we assume that the experimental scores have been sampled randomly
           and independently, from a normally distributed population with a group mean
           and an overall constant variance. Since the assumption may be too restrictive for
   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392