Page 66 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 66

COMPLIANT MOTION  41



                               y
                                  x                          A
                      A
                                       B 2                                  B 2
                      B 1                                  B 1
                            T                                    T
                            (a)                                  (b)





                        p
                             A
                                       B 2                                  B 2
                      B 1                                 B 1          A
                               T                                    T
                                                                           p
                            (c)                                  (d)
            Figure 2.9 In this task, as object A is moved by the robot arm along the surface of table
            T , between positions (c) and (d), the control system has to maintain a compliant contact
            between A and T .



            practical purposes the grasped object A becomes the rigid continuation of the
            robot hand. The contact relation between object A and objects B 1 , T ,and B 2 is
            each a point relation and easy to accomplish. Our primary concern is the contact
            relation between object A and surface T during the motion of A along T .This
            contact relation is an external constraint on the arm’s position control during
            this part of the path. The PID controller in our example in Figure 2.8 realizes
            positioning control; that is, it concerns itself only with the robot arm endpoint
            position (θ 1 ,θ 2 ) [or, equivalently, (x, y)]. In the example in Figure 2.9, such
            a controller would work as long as the arm moves in free space. But when
            the arm attempts to move its endpoint along the surface of table T , a contact
            constraint comes in, affecting the y component of the arm motion and acting as
            another “control.” With two simultaneous constraints affecting the same motion
            components, one from the control system and the other from a contact constraint,
            the system is overspecified.
              In other words, we have a potential conflict. Imagine that at some moment
            a little bump on the table will require the arm to move for an instant up and
            then down again. As the robot control will “insist” on moving along the straight
            line, the arm’s positioning system will likely fail because of inconsistency of the
            simultaneous constraints. Besides deviations of surface T from its model, there
            may be a conflict due to modeling uncertainty, controller errors, and so on. We
            need to resolve this conflict.
              The solution is to (a) add a force control at this part of the path and (b) limit
            the force and positioning controls so that each type never creates an overspecified
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71