Page 146 - Separation process principles 2
P. 146

Summary  111


       The average slope in this range is                 From (3-229),
                                                              ,    9.9      kmol         8.1      kmol
                                                              k,  = -           and kk  = -
                                                                        = 9.9----
                                                                                            -
                                                                                            - 8.85-
                                                                  0.9986    h-m2        0.915     h-m2
       From  an  examination  of  (3-242) and  (3-243), the  liquid-phase
              is controlling because the term in kx is much larger than   From (3-243),
       the term in k,.  Therefore, from (3-243), using m = m,,
                                                                               1              kmol
                                                                 K-                      = 9.71-
                                                                  " - (119.9) + [1/56.3(8.85)1   h-m2
                                                          From (3-223),
                    kmol
         or  Kx = 9.66-
                    h-m2                                                                       kmol
                                                                NA = 9.71(0.001975 - 0.001) = 0.00947-
                                                                                               h-m2
      From (3-223),
                                                          which is only a very slight change from parts (a) and (b), where the
                                           kmol
             NA = 9.66(0.001975 - 0.001) = 0.00942-       bulk-flow effect was ignored. The effect is very small because here
                                           h-m2           it is important only in the gas phase; but the liquid-phase resistance
                                                          is controlling.
      (b)  From part  (a), the  gas-phase resistance is almost negligible.
      Therefore, y~, x y~, and XA,  x xi.                 (d) The relative magnitude of the mass-transfer resistances can be
         From (3-241), the  slope my must, therefore, be  taken  at the   written as
      point y~~ = 0.085 and xy\ = 0.001975 on the equilibrium line.
         From  (2),  my = 29.74 + 13,466(0.001975) = 56.3.  From
      (3-243),

                           1              kmol            Thus, the gas-phase resistance is only 2% of the liquid-phase resis-
             K-                      = 9.69-
              " - (119.9) + [1/(56.3)(8.1)]   h-m2 '      tance.  The  interface vapor  mole  fraction can  be  obtained from
                                                          (3-223), after accounting for the bulk-flow effect:
      giving NA = 0.00945 kmo~h-m2. This is only a slight change from
      part (a).
      (c)  We  now  correct for bulk flow. From the results of  parts (a)
      and (b), we have
                                                          Similarly,
            YA~ = 0.085, YA,  = 0.085, XA,  = 0.1975, XA~ = 0.001
         (YB)LM = 1.0 - 0.085 = 0.915 and (x~)~~
                                          0.9986
                                         %



      SUMMARY

      1.  Mass transfer is the net movement of a component in a mixture   5.  Diffusivity values vary by orders of magnitude. Typical values
      from one region to another region of different concentration, often   are  0.10,  1 x  lop5, and  1 x  lop9 cm2/s for ordinary molecular
      between two phases across an interface. Mass transfer occurs by   diffusion of a solute in a gas, liquid, and solid, respectively.
      molecular diffusion, eddy diffusion, and bulk flow. Molecular dif-   6.  Fick's second law for unsteady-state diffusion is readily ap-
      fusion occurs by  a number of  different driving forces, including   plied to semi-infinite and finite stagnant media, including certain
      concentration (the most important), pressure, temperature, and ex-   anisotropic materials.
      ternal force fields.
                                                          7.  Molecular diffusion under laminar-flow conditions can be deter-
      2.  Fick's first law for steady-state conditions states that the mass-   mined from Fick's first and second laws, provided that velocity pro-
      transfer flux by ordinary molecular diffusion is equal to the product   files are available. Common cases include falling liquid-film flow,
      of the diffusion coefficient (diffusivity) and the negative of the con-   boundary-layer flow on a flat plate, and fully developed flow in a
      centration gradient.                                straight, circular tube. Results are often expressed in terms of a rnass-
      3.  Two limiting cases of mass transfer are equimolar counterdif-   transfer coefficient embedded in a dimensionless group called the
      fusion (EMD) and unimolecular diffusion (UMD). The former is   Sherwood number. The mass-transfer flux is given by the product of
      also a good approximation for dilute conditions. The latter must in-   the mass-transfer coefficient and a concentration driving force.
      clude the bulk-flow effect.                         8.  Mass transfer in turbulent flow is often predicted by  analogy
      4.  When experimental data are not available, diffusivities in gas   to heat transfer. Of  particular importance is the Chilton-Colbum
      and liquid mixtures can be estimated. Diffusivities in  solids, in-   analogy,  which  utilizes  empirical j-factor  correlations  and  the
      cluding porous solids, crystalline solids, metals, glass, ceramics,   dimensionless Stanton number for mass transfer. A more accurate
      polymers, and cellular solids, are best measured. For some solids-   equation by Churchill and Zajic should be used for flow in tubes,
      for example, wooddiffusivity is an anisotropic property.   particularly at high Schmidt and Reynolds numbers.
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151