Page 158 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 158

Chapter 5.  Performance and perceptions of silence  145



             above). More importantly, a comparison of Tables 5.8 and 5.9, and Tables 5.10 and
             5.13, above, shows that although Kylie’s average number of other-selected turns
             is not significantly higher than others, her self-selected turns are overwhelmingly
             higher than her classmates. Kylie was observed to be a motivated, enthusiastic and
             active student, and was positively evaluated by Ms. Hardy. Ms. Hardy noted in
             her interview how impressed she was by Kylie’s performance saying, “That [Kylie]
             girl sounds pretty good, too. I thought she was going to be wonderful.” Similarly,
             Gary, a mature student from the US, who was also articulate, voluble and enthusi-
             astic (see Table 5.3), was described by Ms. Hardy as “really committed.” It was also
             the case that he self-selected his turns frequently while the frequency of other-se-
             lected turns was moderate. In contrast to Kylie and Gary, Tadashi was negatively
             evaluated by Ms. Hardy for his classroom performance:

             (36)   [Interview: Ms. Hardy]
                     I’d be interested to know what he was getting. Yes - pass ... I couldn’t imagine it
                     would be a higher level than a pass from just my impression in the classroom.

             Ms. Hardy also commented that Tadashi and Wong Young only spoke when they
             were  asked  direct  questions  (“direct”  meaning  straightforward  factual  memory
             checking questions), which she found unsatisfactory. Moreover, the negative eval-
             uation expressed in the comment above was not an evaluation of classroom perfor-
             mance but actually an evaluation of overall academic performance. This comment
             seems to strongly encode the considerable impact of classroom participation on
             perception of academic competence, at least from Ms. Hardy’s point of view.
                On the other hand, the lecturer in charge of Curriculum and Examinations
             class, Mr. Fuller, noted that Tadashi approached “his tasks and learning with some
             enthusiasm.” He added, “[Tadashi] seems to be unafraid to ask questions when
             necessary.” However, among Tadashi’s total 22 turns through self-selection in this
             class, he asked three questions, two of which were asked during a one-on-one
             period before all other students arrived. The gap in Mr. Fuller’s comments and
             Tadashi’s performance maybe due, as mentioned earlier, to the fact that Mr. Fuller
             is overly careful about giving any judgemental or negative comments.

             5.4.3.2 Case Study 2
             The tables below show the sample group’s patterns of participation in Regular Dis-
             cussion. First of all, comparing the frequency of self-selected turns (Table 5.14)
             and other-selected turns (Table 5.15), it is possible to see that all the students in
             the sample group take their turns more frequently through self-selection, however
             Miki’s turns are almost evenly taken through self-selection and other-selection.
                The percentage of self-selected turns out of total turns for each participant is
             shown below in Table 5.16.
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163