Page 226 - Silence in Intercultural Communication

References 213

Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work-related values.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
House, J. 1993. “Toward a model for the analysis of inappropriate responses in native/nonnative
interactions.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds), 161–183.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. 1972. “On communicative competence.” In Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, J. Pride
and J. Holmes (eds), 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hymes, D. 1974a. “Toward ethnographies of communication.” In Foundations in Sociolin-
guistics: An ethnographic approach, D. Hymes (ed.), 3–28. Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania Press.
Hymes, D. 1974b. “Ways of speaking.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, P. Bau-
man and J. Sherzer (eds), 433–451. New York: Cambridge.
Ide, S. 1989. “Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic
politeness.” Multilingua 2 (3): 223–248.
Ikeda, M. 2000. Yutori aru shougakko kyoiku [Primary education which gives the children
latitude]. Nichigō Press, May 2000.
Jaworski, A. 1993. The Power of Silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications.
Jaworski, A. (ed.). 1997. Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaworski, A. 2000. “Silence and small talk.” In Small Talk, J. Coupland (ed.), 110–132. London:
Longman.
Jaworski, A., Coupland, N. and Galasiński, D. (eds.) 2004. Metalanguage: Social and ideological
perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaworski, A. and Galasinski, D. 2000. “Strategies of silence: Omission and ambiguity in the
Black Book of Polish censorship.” Semiotica 131 (1/2): 185–200.
Jaworski, A. and Sachdev, I. 1998. “Beliefs about silence in the classroom.” Language and Educa-
tion 12 (4): 273–92.
Jaworski, A. and Sachdev, I. 2004. “Teachers’ beliefs about students’ talk and silence: Construct-
ing academic success and failure through metapragmatic comments.” In Metalanguage:
Social and ideological perspectives, A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński (eds.),
227–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaworski, A. and Stephens, D. 1998. “Self-reports on silence as a face-saving strategy by people
with hearing impairment.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (1): 61–80.
Jefferson, G. 1984. “Notes on a systematic development of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’
and ‘mm hm’.” Papers in Linguistics 17 (2): 197–216.
Jefferson, G. 1989. “Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maxi-
mum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation.” In Conversation: An interdisci-
plinary perspective, D. Roger and P. Bull (eds), 166–196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jones, J. F. 1999. “From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students’ participation in aca-
demic group discussion.” English for Specific Purposes 18 (3): 243–259.
Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S. (eds) 1993. Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Kato, K. 2001. “Exploring ‘cultures of learning’: A case of Japanese and Australian classrooms.”
Journal of Intercultural Studies 22 (1): 51–67.
Knapp, K., Enninger, W. and Knapp-Potthoff, A. (eds). 1987. Analyzing Intercultural Commu-
nication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.