Page 181 - Six Sigma for electronics design and manufacturing
P. 181

Six Sigma for Electronics Design and Manufacturing
                     150
                     Method 4. Moving range method (n = 2)
                     For  each  subgroup,  obtain  the  average  range  between  successive
                     numbers:
                        Subgroup I:   = R  /d 2(n=2) = 1.67/1.128 = 1.48
                        Subgroup II:   = R  /d 2 = 1.89/1.128 = 1.68
                        Subgroup III:   = R  /d 2 = 1.67/1.128 = 1.48
                                                – –
                     For the total groups (I–III),   = R/d 2 = 1.74/1.128 = 1.54.
                       As can be seen from Example 5.10, the   of the overall 30 numbers
                     was 1.62 (Method 1). The 30 numbers were made of three subgroups
                     (samples) with large shifts in sample averages. The closest indirectly
                     calculated   value was obtained by Method 2, between-group varia-
                     tion from the R   estimator of  , because it negated the average shifts.
                     The moving range method (Method 4) was as much as 10% off, even
                     when using the full 30 numbers. The least accurate value was Method
                     3, the between-group variation, which derived   from a distribution of
                     sample  averages  and  the  conversion  of  the  sample  to  population  .
                     The number of subgroups (samples) was small and led to the largest
                     error in   determination.
                     5.2.4  Process capability for low-volume production
                     When it is not feasible to collect the amount of data required to deter-
                     mine process capability because of cost or resource issues or produc-
                     tion  volume,  reduced  data  can  be  used  successfully  to  estimate
                     process capability, provided that confidence is quantified in the data
                     analysis. Although 30 points of data are considered statistically sig-
                     nificant, a smaller number of data points can be taken, using prede-
                     termined error levels and confidence goals, to obtain a good estima-
                     tion of process average and variability. Refer to earlier sections in this
                     chapter for proper methods and examples.
                       The moving range method provides an alternate mechanism for es-
                     timating the   for small amounts of data, provided that data points
                     are  taken  over  time  for  both  variable  and  attribute  processes.  Ten
                     data point are required to provide an estimator for   with the moving
                     range method.

                     5.2.5  Moving range (MR) methodologies for low
                     volume: MR control charts
                     The moving range methodology allows for a reasonable estimate of
                     and  process  capability  for  both  variable  and  attribute  processes.  It
                     uses individual measurements or defect rates over a representative
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186