Page 183 - Six Sigma for electronics design and manufacturing
P. 183

Six Sigma for Electronics Design and Manufacturing
                     152
                     Example 5.12
                     Fuses are made in a production line, with specifications of 5 ± 2 ohms.
                     A sample of six fuses measurement was taken at 3, 6, 6, 4, 5, and 5
                     ohms. If it is desired to have an X  , R control chart, what is the quality
                     data for the fuse line?
                                 Moving range method data = 3 0 2 1 0
                                      Average X   = 4.83; M  R   = 1.2
                                      = M  R  /d 2 = 1.2/1.128 = 1.0638
                                    UCL x = 4.83 + 2.66 · M  R   = 8.02
                                    LCL x = 4.83 – 2.66 · M  R   = 1.64
                                 UCL R = D 4(n=2) · M  R   = 3.27 · 1.2 = 3.92
                                             LCL R = 0
                         Cp = 2/3 · 1.0638 = 0.63; Cpk = (4.83 – 3)/3 · 1.0638 = 0.57
                               z 1 = (3 – 4.83)/1.0638 = –1.72; f(z 1 ) = 0.0427
                               z 2 = (7 – 4.83)/1.0638 = 2.04; f(–z 2 ) = 0.0207
                     Defect rate (RR) = 0.0427 + 0.0207 = 0.0634 or 6.34% or 63,400 PPM
                     5.2.6  Process capability studies in industry
                     The discussions in the previous sections outlined a system for investi-
                     gating and maintaining process capability for the purpose of quality
                     planning. In the six sigma environment, process capability data will
                     have to be maintained within one or more of the indicators that were
                     discussed in previous chapters, including DPU (PPM), DPMO, yield,
                     and number of sigma’s quality (including six sigma). Knowing that all
                     of these indicators are related to each other as discussed and shown
                     by examples in previous chapters, an enterprise can decide on one of
                     these indicators, or a combination of several, and use the indicator(s)
                     in process capability studies. This is especially useful when the enter-
                     prise management or major customers have asked for a certain level
                     of quality.
                       An example would be a factory that chose Cpk as the process capa-
                     bility indicator. This requires that all of the fabrication and assembly
                     operations, as well as major part suppliers and outside manufactur-
                     ing  contractors,  are  to  report  on  their  process  capabilities.  For  the
                     suppliers and contractors, a supplier management team and contrac-
                     tual processes with quality as well as cost and delivery requirements
                     have  to  be  in  place  to  indicate  the  need  for  process  capability.  The
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188