Page 73 - Six Sigma for electronics design and manufacturing
P. 73

Six Sigma for Electronics Design and Manufacturing
                     42

                                    Figure 2.6 Specification and control limits.

                                               – –
                                               X =
                     and

                                              s =                           (2.3)
                                                  n
                     where n is the sample size for each point on the X   chart.
                       The X   control charts work as follows. Each X   point on the chart rep-
                     resents a sample average of n measurements (as discussed in the next
                     chapter). If the average of a certain sample is calculated with a value
                     just below the 3 s limit in one instance, it is theoretically possible that
                     the  control  chart  will  not  indicate  an  out-of-control  condition,  since
                     the X   point will be plotted inside the 3 s limit. The factory supplying
                     the parts will not necessarily indicate that an out-of-control condition
                     has occurred in the manufacturing process and will not take correc-
                     tive action. Assuming a typical sample size of n = 4, the 3 s is equal to
                     ±1.5  . Thus, the average of the manufacturing process could theoret-
                     ically shift by ±1.5   without triggering the “out-of-control” condition
                     indicated by the SQC process.


                     2.2  The Cpk Approach Versus Six Sigma
                     Six sigma is focused on the production defect rate or first time yield
                     (FTY) prediction based on the interaction of the process parameters
                     versus  the  specified  tolerance.  This  ±1.5    average  shift  that  is  al-
                     lowed under certain definitions of six sigma has led to confusion over
                     defect and FTY calculations. The definition of Cpk attempts to rectify
                     this condition: it is the minimum of the two halves of the distribution
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78