Page 97 - Six Sigma for electronics design and manufacturing
P. 97

Six Sigma for Electronics Design and Manufacturing
                     66
                     engineers are responsible for setting the specification limits for new
                     products as broad as possible and still permit the proper functioning
                     of the product. Manufacturing engineers have to narrow the manu-
                     facturing  process  distribution,  as  measured  by  the  standard  devia-
                     tion of the product characteristics. This can be achieved by more fre-
                     quent  maintenance  schedules,  improving  incoming  inspection
                     methods,  working  with  suppliers,  increased  operator  training,  and
                     performing design of experiments (DoE) to reduce the variability of
                     the process.
                       The  formal  definitions  of  six  sigma  and  other  quality  measuring
                     systems such as Cp and Cpk were introduced. In addition, their rela-
                     tionship to determining the defect rate and examples of calculations
                     were  also  shown,  from  both  variable  and  attribute  manufacturing
                     processes. An important part of these quality systems is the under-
                     standing  of  the  assumptions  underlying  each  system.  The  choice  of
                     the proper system should be compatible with the type of business the
                     enterprise is engaged in and its competition.
                       The assumption that all manufacturing and supply data are nor-
                     mally  distributed  was  examined,  and  methods  to  prove  normality
                     were shown. In the case of nonnormality, alternate methods for trans-
                     forming  data  to  normal  distribution,  performing  six  sigma  calcula-
                     tions, and then converting the data back to the original distribution
                     were also shown.
                     2.6  References and Bibliography
                     Bowker A. and Lieberman G. Engineering Statistics. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:
                        Prentice-Hall, 1972.
                     Box, G. and Hunter W. Statistics for Experimenters. New York: Wiley, 1978.
                     Burr, I. Engineering Statistics and Quality Control. New York: McGraw Hill,
                        1953.
                     Chan,  L.  et  al.  “A  New  Measure  for  Process  Capability:  Cpm.”  Journal  of
                        Quality Technology, 20, 3, 162–175, July, 1988.
                     Clausing D. and Simpson H. “Quality by Design.” Quality Progress, January
                        1990, 41–44.
                     Crosby, P. Quality Is Free. New York: McGraw Hill, 1979.
                     Deming, Edwards. Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Published
                        video lectures and notes. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Studies.
                        1982.
                     Devore, J. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Bel-
                        mont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1987.
                     Dixon W. and Massey, F. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. New York: Mc-
                        Graw Hill, 1969.
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102