Page 331 - Solid Waste Analysis and Minimization a Systems Approach
P. 331

PERFORMANCE PARAMETER CASE STUDY             309



                      As shown in the validation table, all the regression coefficients developed from the
                    research data (national survey) and data gathered from other agencies were statistically
                    equal at the 95 percent confidence level. This validated the research data and model
                    findings with an external source.
                      The integrated model was also validated using an artificial intelligence (AI) pro-
                    gram (neural networks) to examine one typical waste group with a relatively large
                    amount of research data.  The commercial/government waste group was chosen
                    with 124 company waste records. The results of the AI program yielded similar
                    results to the multivariable regression model developed for this waste group (an
                    average error estimate of 5.8 percent). The benefits of AI are the ability for the pro-
                    gram to learn as new data is entered to strengthen the predictions. One drawback
                    of AI for this research is that larger amounts of data are required over that of regres-
                    sion modeling.




                    19.3 Demonstration of the Prediction


                    of Solid Waste Generation Using the

                    Developed Model



                    This section discusses a demonstration case study of the integrated environmental
                    model’s prediction capability and margin of error. An electronic manufacturing equip-
                    ment company was randomly selected from the Greene County data set. Table 19.3
                    displays the actual data that was gathered from the company and the values predicted
                    by the integrated environmental model. The company employed 60 people, paid $60
                    per ton to dispose of solid waste, and was not ISO 14001 certified.
                      As shown in the table, the actual data was 13.3 tons or 5.4 percent more than the
                    model prediction.  At most, actual material composition tonnages were approxi-
                    mately 10 percent different than predictions with most approximately +/− 5 percent
                    different. This random sample demonstration indicated the effectiveness and accu-
                    racy of the integrated environmental model. Figure 19.1 displays the graphical version
                    of the data.




                    19.4 Performance Parameter


                    Case Study



                    Two companies were selected from the electronic manufacturer’s waste group to
                    demonstrate the solid waste performance parameters. These companies’ waste records
                    were provided by the Greene County (Ohio) Solid  Waste District. One company
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336