Page 367 - Structural Steel Designers Handbook AISC, AASHTO, AISI, ASTM, and ASCE-07 Design Standards
P. 367

Brockenbrough_Ch08.qxd  9/29/05  5:21 PM  Page 8.21



                                                       LATERAL-FORCE DESIGN


                                                                                   LATERAL-FORCE DESIGN  8.21

                                  the plastic resistance of the ductile element on the mean or expected resistance rather than the nom-
                                  inal resistance, because expected resistance is normally larger than the nominal capacity. If the
                                  expected resistance is larger than anticipated, the ductile element may not achieve its full ductility
                                  before a peripheral, less ductile element fails. The AISC provisions address this issue by multiply-
                                  ing the nominal plastic resistance of a ductile element by an expected strength factor R y . Modern
                                  structural steels often vary widely from the nominal yield stress, and thus R y is defined by

                                                                       F
                                                                   R =  ye                           (8.18a)
                                                                    y
                                                                       F y
                                  where F ye and F y are the expected and the nominal minimum specified yield stress, respectively. This
                                  R y value can be established through testing or, in the absence of test data, specification-defined val-
                                  ues of between 1.1 and 1.6 are provided in the provisions, depending on the grade of steel. R y is used
                                  to evaluate the uncertainty in material properties and how this affects the seismic performance of the
                                  building. Similar balance checks are sometimes required using the ultimate tensile stress of the steel.
                                  The ratio, R t , of the expected ultimate tensile stress to the nominal tensile stress is defined as
                                                                   R =  F te                         (8.18b)
                                                                    t
                                                                       F t
                                  where F te and F t are the expected and the nominal tensile stresses, respectively. The AISC provides
                                  values between 1.1 and 1.3 for the steels commonly used in seismic design.
                                    Second, many steel structural systems achieve their ductility by plastic deformation in the steel
                                  near welded joints. Welds and the heat-affected zone immediately adjacent to welds may have dif-
                                  ferent properties than steel members, and there is a greater probability of local or internal flaws in
                                  welded joints than in steel sections.  The FEMA recommendations for special moment-resisting
                                  frames resulting require that the welds be a matching metal and require a minimum toughness of
                                  welds in regions where large inelastic strain demands occur. This requirement assures adequate
                                  inelastic strain capacity of the welded joint to achieve ductile performance. AISC provisions add
                                  these requirements to demand-critical welds for other structural systems.  These demand-critical
                                  welds must use a filler metal capable of providing a minimum Charpy V-notch (CVN) toughness of
                                  20 ft⋅lb at −20°F and 40 ft⋅lb at 70°F.
                                    Third, columns are extremely critical elements in all structural systems, since the columns must
                                  support gravity load regardless of the earthquake excitation. As a result, the forces and moments in
                                  columns are very uncertain when complex inelastic deformations of the frames occur. When the fac-
                                  tored axial load on the column exceeds 40% of the nominal capacity, the columns must have ade-
                                  quate resistance to satisfy additional load-factor combinations provided in the IBC. These additional
                                  load combinations assure that columns are designed with adequate resistance to support all combi-
                                  nations of earthquake loads and dead loads on the structure. The reader is referred to the IBC provi-
                                  sions for the specific load combinations.

                      8.7.1 Limitations on Moment-Resisting Frames
                                  Structural tests have shown that steel moment-resisting frames may provide excellent ductility and
                                  inelastic behavior under severe seismic loading. Because these frames are frequently quite flexible,
                                  drift limits often control the design. The NEHRP seismic provisions recognize this ductility and
                                  assigns R = 8.0 to special moment-resisting frames (Art. 8.4).
                                  Slenderness Requirements. Special steel moment-resisting frames must satisfy a range of slen-
                                  derness requirements to control buckling during the plastic deformation in a severe earthquake. The
                                  unsupported length, L b , of bending members must satisfy
                                                                     .
                                                                     0 086  rE
                                                                 L ≤      y                           (8.19)
                                                                  b
                                                                       F y

                              Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
                                         Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                                          Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372