Page 282 - The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method
P. 282

EXPANSION OF THE DETONATION GAS      265

                           1
                          0.9
                          0.8                    Isentropic expansion
                                                   Pressure change
                          0.7
                        + 10 Pa)  0.6

                          0.5
                        p (e  0.4
                          0.3
                          0.2
                          0.1
                           0
                            0     0.2   0.4    0.6   0.8    1     1.2   1.4
                                             v (e−02 m^3/kg)
                               Figure 8.2 Pressure versus specific volume.


           This means that for the first stage the gas pressure is given by (8.14), while the gas
           pressure for the second stage of expansion is calculated using equation (8.33). Because
           no heat exchange between the chamber walls and gas takes place, both stages of expansion
           involve adiabatic expansion, although pressure decrease in the first stage is slower, while
           the pressure decrease in the second stage is more rapid due to the gas expansion being
           coupled with mechanical work.
             The assumption that no heat transfer taking place between detonation gas and chamber
           walls is due to the very short time in which expansion takes place. Given the law of thermal
           conductivity of rock, no significant change in the internal energy of the detonation gas
           due to heat transfer takes place.
             In Figure 8.2 pressure versus specific volume is shown. The figure shows a rapid reduc-
           tion in pressure due to the increase of the specific volume. The pressure drops from 10 GPa
           to almost atmospheric pressure with proportionally much smaller change in the specific
           volume. Different pressure-specific volume curves applied to the same explosive induced
           fracture and fragmentation process in general produce different transient stress and strain
           fields, and consequently different fracture patterns. Pressure as a function of time can be
           expressed as the summation of harmonics of different frequencies. The natural frequency
           of a dynamic load is one of the most important parameters in numerical simulation of
           dynamic solid systems. In this light, it is evident that user-supplied pressure-time curves
           lead to non-objective results. However, it is paradoxical that even very complicated models
           taking into account gas expansion can yield non-objective pressure-time curves.
             In Figure 8.3 the internal energy change versus pressure of the detonation gas is shown.
           Again, the reduction in internal energy with the reduction in pressure is very rapid. This
           means that most of the energy of the detonation gas is released at relatively high pressure.
           Most of the mechanical work is done by the expanding gas at relatively high pressure. The
           portion of energy remaining after the initial pressure drop is relatively small. For instance,
           in rock blasting operations, the specific energy of the explosive is usually shown as a sum
           of kinetic energy, strain energy, fracture energy, etc. Results shown in Figure 8.3 indicate
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287