Page 326 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 326

312               The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation


               Continuing with the example, 1 percent of the average of the highest consecutive 5 out of
            the last 10 years’ earnings would generate an annual annuity of $17,280 (i.e., $432,000/5
            0.01   20   $17,280). The $432,000 is the sum of $100,000, $92,500, $87,500, $79,500, and
            $72,500 (or an average of $86,400). The highest five out of 10 is the most prevalent approach,
            although some plans use the highest three out of five. Anything less will have difficulties pass-
            ing the IRS review for qualified-plan status. Using the average highest consecutive three out
            of five in our example would result in an annuity of $18,667, or 8 percent higher. Thus, since
            using more years in calculating the average usually drops the value, the benefit rate can be
            manipulated to meet a targeted payout level.
               Other things being equal, the executive receiving large pay increases is more interested in
            reducing the number of years used in calculating the average than a person receiving more
            modest pay increases. Table 6-27 shows the impact of using the highest 3-, 5-, or 10-year earn-
            ings averages versus full career-earnings average, assuming pay increases of 5, 10, or 15 percent
            over 15, 25, and 35 years of service. For example, using a three-year average for a person with
            25 years of service who consistently received 10 percent increases would put earnings for
            pension purposes at approximately 128 percent more than if a similar career average were used.
            The greatest variance is at the highest compound pay increase (15 percent), the most years of
            service (35), and the fewest number of years in the average (3). Thus, the higher the “number
            of years” used to define earnings, the higher the needed formula percentage and vice versa.


                                          Number of Years Used to Calculate Average
                                          Three           Five             Ten

                 35 Years of Service

                 15% pay increase          303%           255%             166%
                 10% pay increase          201            175              123
                  5% pay increase           94             85               65
                 25 Years of Service

                 15% pay increase          194            159               94
                 10% pay increase          128            109               69
                  5% pay increase           61             54               37

                 15 Years of Service
                 15% pay increase           95             72               29
                 10% pay increase           64             50               21
                  5% pay increase           31             25               12

            Table 6-27. Years (service plus plan formula) and pay increase for final-pay versus career-
            earnings plans

               Another example of the power of compounding is shown in Table 6-28. Five individuals
            start at $50,000 a year but receive compound average annual income of 3 percent, 6 percent,
            9 percent, 12 percent, and 15 percent for 35 years. This history shows 5-year intervals. The
            average of the final 5 years of pay is also shown for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 years of
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331