Page 112 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 112

98   I n t e g r a t e d   P l a n n i n g                                   S t r a t e g i c   P l a n n i n g    99


                                Dilemma: System or Process?
                                The measurement issue harks back to the earlier discussion about sys-
                                tems versus processes and the fallacy of assuming that the sum of local
                                efficiencies is the system optimum. Traditional rationale maintains that
                                achieving the highest possible productivity in every discrete function of
                                the system equates to good management. Productivity is typically repre-
                                sented as the ratio of out puts to inputs. These inputs and outputs are
                                sometimes expressed in financial terms. Managers often spend inordinate
                                time  chasing  higher  productivity  for  their  own  departments,  without
                                much concern for whether the whole system benefits or not. This under-
                                scores the heart of the problem: How can we be sure that the decisions
                                we make day-to-day truly benefit the system as a whole. In other words,
                                how  can  local  decisions  be  related  to  the  global  performance  of  the
                                company?
                                   This is not necessarily an easy question to answer. Consider yourself
                                a pro duction manager for a moment. A sales manager comes to you and
                                asks you to interrupt your current production run (that is, break a setup)
                                to process a small but urgent order for a customer. How will doing what
                                the sales manag er wants affect the company’s bottom line? What will it
                                cost to break the setup (both financially and to the production manager’s
                                productivity  figures)?  How  much  will  it  benefit  the  company?  Or  the
                                production  department?  These  are  not  easy  questions  to  answer,  yet
                                throughout many companies people are called upon to make such deci-
                                sions daily.

                                New Financial Measures
                                Assuming that a company’s goal is to make more money, Goldratt con-
                                ceived of three simple financial measures to ensure that local decisions
                                line up effectively with this goal. These measures are easy to apply by
                                anyone  at  vir tually  any  level  of  a  company:  Throughput,  Inventory  or
                                Investment, and Operating Expense (Goldratt, 1990, pp. 19–51).
                                   Throughput  (T)  is  defined  as  the  rate  at  which  a  system  generates
                                money through sales (Goldratt, 1990, p. 19). Another way to think about it
                                is the marginal contribution of sales to profit. Throughput can be assessed
                                for the entire company over some period of time, or it can be broken out
                                by product line, or even by individual unit of product sold. Mathemati-
                                cally, Throughput equates to sales revenue minus variable cost.

                                                          T = SR - VC

                                   Inventory (I) is defined as all the money the system invests in purchas-
                                ing things it intends to sell (presumably after adding some value to them)
                                (Goldratt, 1990, p. 23). Because Goldratt’s concept of Inventory includes
                                fixed assets, such as equipment, facilities, and real estate, the term “I” has
                                come to represent “investment” as well, rather than just “inventory” alone.








          05_Pyzdek_Ch05_p061-102.indd   99                                                             11/9/12   5:04 PM
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117