Page 108 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 108

94   I n t e g r a t e d   P l a n n i n g                                   S t r a t e g i c   P l a n n i n g    95
























                                Figure 5.9  Basic DBR concept (adapted from Schragenheim and Dettmer, 2000).




                                Critical Chain concept provides an effective way to schedule project activ-
                                ities by effec tively accommodating uncertainty and resolving simultane-
                                ous needs (con tentions) for the same resource. Critical Chain constitutes
                                the application to one-time projects of the same principles that DBR applies
                                to repetitive pro duction. The result of applying Critical Chain scheduling
                                and resource allo cation is a higher probability of completing projects on
                                time, and, in some cases, actually shortening total project duration. Origi-
                                nally applied to  the management of a  single project, the Critical Chain
                                method has been expand ed to multiproject environments, based on the
                                concept of the “drum,” described in Drum-Buffer-Rope, above.
                                   Since  projects  aren’t  quite  the  same  as  repetitive  production,  some
                                differ ences in employing Critical Chain project planning are inevitable.
                                But the concepts are much the same as those of DBR. What distinguishes
                                Critical  Chain  from  PERT/CPM  and  other  traditional  project  manage-
                                ment approaches?
                                   First, Critical Chain recognizes and accounts for some human behav-
                                ioral  phenomena  that  traditional  project  management  methods  don’t
                                (Leach, 2000; Newbold, 1998). These phenomena include:
                                    1.  The tendency of technical professionals to “pad” their time estimates
                                       for  individual  tasks,  in  an  effort  to  protect  themselves  from  late
                                       com pletion.
                                    2.  The so-called “student syndrome”—waiting until the last minute
                                       to begin work on a task with a deadline.
                                    3.  Parkinson’s law (ensuring that an activity consumes every bit of
                                       the estimated time, no matter how quickly the associated tasks can
                                       actual ly be completed).







          05_Pyzdek_Ch05_p061-102.indd   95                                                             11/9/12   5:04 PM
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113