Page 273 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 273

260     C o n t i n u o u s   I m p r o v e m e n t                                                                                                              e f f e c t i v e   C h a n g e   M a n a g e m e n t    261


                                         Process          A        B       C        D
                                         Scrap rate       8%       3%      5%       7%

                                       (Pyzdek and Keller, 2010)

                                       Table 12.3  Example Process Scrap Rates


                                begin with projects that reduced the scrap produced by Worker A. In fact,
                                assuming the optimum product mix, Worker A has about 25 percent slack
                                time, so the scrap loss can be made up without shutting down Worker B,
                                who  is  the  constraint.  The  TOC  would  suggest  that  the  scrap  loss  of
                                Worker B and the downstream processes C and D be addressed first, the
                                precise opposite of what Pareto analysis recommends.
                                   Of course, before making a decision as to which projects to finance,
                                cost/benefit analyses are still necessary, and the probability of the project
                                succeeding must be estimated. But by using the TOC you will at least know
                                where to look first for opportunities.

                                Using Constraint Information to Focus Six Sigma Projects
                                Applying the TOC strategy described earlier tells us where in the process
                                to focus. Adding CTX information (see Table 12.4) can help tell us which




                                 Project
                                 Type        Discussion
                                 CTQ         Any unit produced by the constraint is especially valuable
                                             because if it is lost as scrap additional constraint time must be
                                             used to replace it or rework it. Since constraint time determines
                                             throughput (net profit of the entire system), the loss far exceeds
                                             what appears on scrap and rework reports. CTQ projects at the
                                             constraint are the highest priority.
                                 CTS         CTS projects can reduce the time it takes the constraint to
                                             produce a unit, which means that the constraint can produce
                                             more units. This directly impacts throughput. CTS projects at the
                                             constraint are the highest priority.
                                 CTC         Since the constraint determines throughput, the unavailability of
                                             the constraint causes lost throughput of the entire system. This
                                             makes the cost of constraint downtime extremely high. The cost of
                                             operating the constraint is usually minuscule by comparison. Also,
                                             CTC projects can have an adverse impact on quality or schedule.
                                             Thus, CTC projects at the constraint are low priority.


                                (Pyzdek and Keller, 2010)
                                Table 12.4  Throughput Priority of CTX Projects That Affect the Constraint








          12_Pyzdek_Ch12_p241-264.indd   260                                                            11/9/12   5:13 PM
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278