Page 346 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 346

332   C o n t i n u o u s   I m p r o v e m e n t                                A n a l y z e   S t a g e    333


                                                          Customer satisfaction scores
                                                     Personal response vs. cycle time interaction
                                                                                Cycle time
                                               37.0                             330.000
                                             Satisfaction score means  29.0     210.000
                                              33.0




                                              25.0

                                               21.0
                                                         No                   Yes
                                                              Personal response
                                Figure 15.11  Results of designed experiment to estimate interaction between
                                personal response and cycle time factors.



                                no  observed  difference  between  personalized  response  and  generic
                                response at that level of response cycle time.
                                   On the 330.000 response cycle time line, moving from no personalized
                                response to yes personalized response (left to right along the line), there is
                                very large change in customer satisfaction score. This implies that personal-
                                ized response is a significant contributor to the change in customer satisfac-
                                tion score, but apparently only at the low (210) level of response cycle time.
                                   The  implication  is  that  the  estimate  of  the  effect  of  personalized
                                response changes depending on whether the effects are measured at
                                low cycle time or high cycle time. This provides evidence of an interac-
                                tion between personalized response and cycle time.
                                   When  interactions  are  ignored,  haphazard  results  may  be  obtained
                                from improvement efforts:

                                    •  A  factor  may  appear  unimportant  if  interacting  factors  are  not
                                      changed at the same time, as shown in the example.
                                    •  A process improvement effort may only attain desired results for a
                                      period of time (so long as the interacting factors remain constant).
                                      If we don’t vary the right factors, it appears an improvement has
                                      been  made,  but  then  it  is  gone.  This  can  happen  when  there  is
                                      another factor present that was not included in the experiment.
                                    •  The effect of one factor may be minimized by reducing the variation
                                      of another. This is the Taguchi approach to robust design, and can be
                                      seen by looking at the prior example in a slightly different way. Since
                                      the effect of personalized response was negligible at low response
                                      cycle times, if response cycle time is kept near its low setting then
                                      changes in personalized response wouldn’t make much difference.








          15_Pyzdek_Ch15_p305-334.indd   333                                                          11/20/12   10:33 PM
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351