Page 36 - The Petroleum System From Source to Trap
P. 36

28     Smith







                                                                                         A

                                                                        ATLANTIC OCEAN


                                           RESULTS Of 1968
                                          OFFSHORE  TEXAS SALE
                                           FIEPORTEO IN  1975
                                         TRACTS  LEASED - 110
                                         TRACTS RELIHQI.JSHED - 92.5
                                         TRACTS PRODUCTIVE  - 6 -
                                               ALL  ARE  GAS�
                                         PRE 1968 DISCOVERIES   <:=:    BALTIMORE CANYON
                                         ,......, ,......, MAJOR FAlA..T  TREMJS   O.C.S., SALE 40   A '   ..l2!L....
                                                                            SEPT. 1, 1976        D AREA  OFFERED
                                                             Figure 2.4. Area offered in 1976 Baltimore Canyon sale on
                                                             the Atlantic coast.


            Figure 2.3. Gas discoveries made on tracts purchased in   of 650  ft  from  the  crest  to  the spill  point.  We  estimated
           the 1968 Offshore Texas sale.                     the total volume of this structural trap in the uppermost
                                                             600 ft of the Lower Cretaceous  sandstone to be approxi­
                                                             mately 24 billion  bbl. Such a trap, if full, can be expected
            SCHLEE DOME:  1976 BALTIMORE                     to  hold a recoverable volume of approximately 7 billion
            CANYON SALE                                      bbl of oil.
                                                               The Schlee dome was created by a Lower Cretaceous
              The Schlee dome is a large, deep feature located in the   igneous  intrusive.  The  Jurassic  and  part of the  Lower
           offshore Atlantic region about 70 mi from the New Jersey   Cretaceous  were uplifted  and  eroded  around  the
           coast.  Overlying  sedimentary rock layers are affected by   intrusive (Figure 2.6). It was assumed that this structural
           this  feature.  Presale evaluation showed  excellent   deformation caused  extensive  fracturing and  allowed
           reservoir rock,  seal rock, and trap  geometry over and
           around the Schlee dome.  One  trap  on the dome was a   vertical communication throughout  the  disturbed
           simple domal closure with a capacity to store about 7   interval. This assumption led to two conclusions. First, all
           billion bbl of recoverable oil. Naturally a trap of this size   hydrocarbons that had migrated to the Schlee dome area
           attracted much attention. The winning bids on the Schlee   prior to the deposition of the Upper Cretaceous shale seal
           dome tracts  totaled $544 million  (West,  1976).  Here the   would  be  lost  during  the  period  of  uplift  and  erosion.
           Schlee  dome and  the  hydrocarbon  generation and   Second,  all  hydrocarbons  that  migrated  to  the Schlee
           migration system that feeds it are treated as a petroleum   dome after the deposition of the Upper Cretaceous shale
            system.  No  hard  evidence  could be  developed  to show   seal would enter the trap in the thick Lower Cretaceous
            that mature  oil- or gas-prone source  rocks  were present   sandstone below the Upper Cretaceous shale seal. Based
            in  this  petroleum  system.  Accordingly, a major  task of   on these two conclusions, we have treated this trap and
            the Shell evaluation team  was to assess the likelihood   the stratigraphic section capable of generating hydrocar­
            that mature  source  rocks  were  indeed  present in the   bons within  the  Schlee  dome fetch area after the  shale
           Schlee dome fetch area.                           seal deposition as a single petroleum system.
                                                                The uncertain part of the evaluation of this petroleum
                                                             system was estimating the volume and type of hydrocar­
            Geologic Setting
                                                             bons generated  within  the fetch area after deposition  of
              The geologic setting of the Schlee dome has been thor­  the shale seal. The COST-B-2 well penetrated 16,043 ft of
           oughly  described  in  the  literature  (Schlee  et  al.,  1976;   sedimentary rocks (Figure 2.5). Mature oil- or gas-prone
           Mattick, 1980; Prather, 1991). For purposes of this presen­  source rocks  were  not  detected.  The  Jurassic-Lower
            tation,  we have  included  the following  items:  an index   Cretaceous  intervals  contained  coaly  material.  The
           map  (Figure 2.4), a  regional cross  section  (Figure 2.5), a   thermal maturity at total  depth is only 0.90% Ro. Shell's
           reflection seismic line across Schlee dome (Figure 2.6),   estimate of  the relationship between vitrinte reflectance
           the stratigraphy of the COST-B-2  well  (Figure 2.7), and   and  gas expulsion  from  type  III  kerogen is  shown  in
           the Schlee dome structure at the top of the Lower Creta­  Figure 2.9. Note that gas expulsion from type ill kerogen
           ceous  (LK)  sandstone package  (Figure  2.8).  Figure  2.7   is  expected  to  start at  1 . 0%  R0•  The  problem  was  to
           shows the thick Upper Cretaceous  shale seal above a   estimate  the  probability  that,  within the  Schlee  dome
           thick  Lower Cretaceous sandstone  package.  Note  the   fetch  area, a mature oil- or gas-prone  source rock exists
           large area of closure at the top of the Lower Cretaceous   deeper than  16,043  ft  that could  have  charged  the  trap
           shown in Figure 2.8,  with a minimum structural  closure   after the Upper Cretaceous shale seal was deposited.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41