Page 40 - The Petroleum System From Source to Trap
P. 40

32     Smitl1





                                                      SEWARD PENINSULA
                        NORTON
                         SOUND







               ST.  LAWRENCE  r/
                  SUBBASIN ")  \
                               -   '- ....
                                .....    '�
                               \      "'''
                                 \
                                  \  '
                           COST 1�f
                            ARCO  ,




                                                                                       CTS ARE DIFFERENT)
                                                                                             t
                                                                                             N
                                                                                             I

                                                                                        0        24
                    �  OCS  SALE  57  AREA
                                                                                           MILES
                    �  PROSPECTS
                    #'   L  EADS



             Figure 2.11. Map of Norton basin area offshore Alaska showing subbasins, prospects, COST wells, and OCS sale 57 acreage.


            acquired a dominant lease position in the Stuart subbasin   a  thicker  stratigraphic  section  is  separated  by  a  thinner
             and  drilled  five  wells  on  four  structures.  No  hydro­  section. Three subbasins are shown on Figure 2.11  along
             carbon accumulations that merited a drill-stem test were   with the many prospects and  leads within and between
             found in these five wells. The availability of stratigraphic   the  subbasins.  Also  shown  are  the  locations  of  the  two
             data and hydrocarbon indications from these wells gave   COST wells  drilled  prior to the  sale and the  acreage put
             us  the  opportunity  to  test  the  value  of  using  petroleum   up in OCS Sale 57 that was held in March 1983.
             system logic as an exploration tool in the Stuart subbasin.   Shell's  understanding  of the geology  of  the Norton
            Accordingly, using only  data  available  before  the  sale,   basin at the time of the 1983 lease sale was derived from
            we  completed  a  "hypothetical"  presale  petroleum   five  sources:  (1) publications of Fisher and  co-workers of
            system evaluation for the Stuart subbasin and compared   the  U.S.  Geologic  Survey  (Fisher  et  al.  1979,  1981, 1982;
            this  evaluation  to  the  drilling results.  This  material  is   Fisher,  1982),  (2)  Soviet  publications,  (3)  the two COST
            presented in part II.                             wells, (4) regional studies conducted by D. M. Worrall of
                                                              Shell  Development  Company,  and  (5)  work  carried  out
            Geologic Setting                                  in the Alaska Division of Shell Oil Company.
                                                                 Worrall's  (1991) work  was  done  on  the  tectonic
               The Norton  basin is  located  in  Norton  Sound  under   history of the Bering Sea and on the evolution of Tertiary
            the offshore  continental  shelf  of  Alaska  between  the   strike-slip  basins  of the  Bering  shelf.  Much  of  his  work
            Seward Peninsula and the Yukon Delta (Figure 2.11). For   was done before the Norton basin sale. His interpretation
            our  purpoes,  the  Norton  basin  outline  is  drawn  where   of the geologic  history of the Norton basin was incorpo­
            the  thickness  of  sedimentary  rocks  exceeds  1  sec  on  a   rated  into  the  evaluation  made  by the  Shell  Oil  Alaska
            seismic reflection profile.  A subbasin  is  formed  wherever   Division and  is presented here.  To  avoid confusion,  we
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45