Page 41 - The Petroleum System From Source to Trap
P. 41

2. Petroleum System Logic as an Exploration Tool   33


                                                                                     HYDROGEN  CUTTINGS
                           %  R o            TOC  wt.%               KEROGEN*           I N DEX     GAS
                     0  2     0 6  1   2   4   0 1   0 5  1   2   5  10   TYPE         HC  (mg)  WETNESS
                     0                  •  0                                          roc  g
                                                                         %                           %
                       •   8             0   � �   •            0 o .---,.-.....::,s..o_-__.:o  o   0   0   so  100
                       •
                                                                                       100  200  3oo  o
                        ., o
                     2   •., 0              at
                                            't;
                        •
                     3  ..                   �(                                      lBO
                        �  •                 0  ��              2                    0   c 0   C>'
                         ••
                     4   a•                     �               3                     �  0   0
                         0
                                                 0
                     5   .x>                  •  <0., •C< AI:   4                    �,8o
                                                                                     o"j
                         �
                                                 •
              w   1-  6   0                   �                                        0
              z   u..                                           5                     §Eo          0
              w      7    'i*                  oO                                         0
              (J  �
                                               o'
              0   J:     �I                   ..  0                                   ?,  0
                           I
              CJ
              ::::i  �  8   .?.              'i  8 q,  ,.                            -�
                                                                                      0
              0   w       ca.                                                        r\ �0
                          o•  I
                   c  9   aO  I                  0  0  eo
                          el  J.                    •
                           �\                    oO  0                                     0
                    10                            •
                            0.\'
                                                                                         0
                     1      oil                  0 0                                 p�  �- ""
                                                                                       0  o
                            •  I                c  � 0  0                              �
                    12      . ,                                                         P
                             *  �                 .·�.  �:
                               0
                               "
                                              i . ,  o
                               0
                     3         •           �  COAL                                    l�
                                                     I
                                                                                      o�e
                                           �.
                    14         0   •       t.�  0              13                    p  0
                                                                                      r9
                                              �
                                  •  0
                     5
                             •  CORE LAB.  o  GEOCHEM  LAB.,   14
                               DATA  FROM OCS  REPORT MMS 86003    *SHELL DEVELOPMENT
                       *·----* CALCULATED  BY  SHELL DEVELOPMENT   1 5  �------�
                                                                 [Z] AM.   CJ VITR.   GEOCHEM  LABORATORIES
                                                                 - EX.    - INERT.    OCS REPORT MMS 86003
            Figure 2.12. Vitrinite reflectance (R0) and total organic
            carbon (TOC) for the COST-1 well in the St. Lawrence   Figure 2.13. Kerogen type by visual analysis, hydrogen
            subbasin. See Figure 2.11 for well location.      index by Rock-Eval pyrolysis, and cuttings gas wetness for
                                                             the COST-1 well, St. Lawrence subbasin. See Figure 2.11
                                                             for well location. Abbreviations: AM, amorphous; EX,
            have followed  the nomenclahrre used by Worrall  (1991).   exinite; VITR, vitrinite; INERT, inertinite.
            The basement  underlying  the  Norton  basin  consists  of
            Precambrian-Paleozoic metamorphics intruded by
            Cretaceous granites. Worrall (1991) showed that there are   include nonmarine  coastal, deltaic, shallow marine, and
            two  distinct  sedimentary  rock  packages  above  the   possibly lacustrine. This sedimentary rock package forms
            basement. The boundary between these  two  packages is   an  onlap  sequence  on  paleobasement  highs  and  basin
            an unconformity that Worrall calls the "red event." Here   margins.  Traps  include  sedimentary  rock  drape  over
            we  refer  to  the  older  of  these  two  sedimentary  rock   basement highs, faults, pinchouts, and onlaps.
            packages  as  the  "pre-red  sequence."  At  the  time of  the
            sale, the age of the red  event was poorly established  but   Part 1: Evaluation of Oil Charge
            was thought to be Paleocene.  The  age of the red event is
            now  thought  to  be  late  middle  Eocene  (44-43  Ma)   Initial Interpretation
            (Worrall,  1991). We refer  to  the younger of the two sedi­  Geochemical  data for the  COST-1  and  COST-2  wells
            mentary  rock  packages  as  the  "basin  fill  sequence."   are  shown  in Figures 2.12-2.15. Most of these data were
            Infolded  remnants  of the pre-red  sequence  are  locally   published by Turner et al. in 1986. The interval shallower
            present  at  various  spots  in the  Norton basin  and  were   than 7000 ft can be ignored  in both  wells  because it does
            found in both COST wells.  Coals  are present in the pre­  not attain the thermal maturity level required for signifi­
            red sequence in both COST wells. An abrupt increase in   cant  oil  expulsion.  Visual  kerogen  analysis  by  Shell
            vitrinite reflectance to about 1.0% Ro was observed at the   Development for COST-1  (Figure 2.13) and by Robertson
            red  event  in  both  COST  wells.  We  assumed  that  any   Research  (U.S.)  for  COST-2  (Figure  2.15), with  which
            potential  for  significant  oil  generation  in  the  pre-red   Shell  concurred,  suggested  a large fraction  of  oil-prone
            section was destroyed at the COST well locations prior to   (lipid) kerogen from about 9000 ft to the unconformity at
            deposition of the basin fill sediments.           about  12,000 ft in  both  wells.  The  vitrinite  reflectance  is
              Slow subsidence with some associated faulting started   lower in this mixed lipid and humic  system than would
            in  late  Eocene  and  has  continued  to  the  present  day.   be observed  in a pure humic coal. To avoid this source of
            Depositional  environments  in  the basin  fill  sequence   error,  the  calculated  trend  of  vitrinite  reflectance  versus
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46