Page 54 - The Petroleum System From Source to Trap
P. 54

46     Smith


             Table 2.4.  Volumes of Gas Available to Reservoirs or   average porosity of 26%. Assuming one-half of this sand
             Prospects                                         forms onlap traps having a total area equal to that shown
                                                               in Figure 2.20 on South Teton, there could be 240 bcf of
                                 Gas Volumes (x  1 Q9 SCF)     gas trapped at the blue level on South Teton.
             Prospect      Expelled   Migration Loss   Available   We  do  not  have  a  map  showing  the  onlap  at  the
             Yellow Pup      150         211          0        deeper  level  on  basement,  but  the  structure  map  on
             South Teton     820         687         1 3 3     basement  suggests that onlap traps at  the deeper level
             Chugach        2070        1 0 87       983       are possible.  There are 82  net-ft  of sandstone  in  an
                                                               interval  170 ft  thick  near  the  top  of  this  lower sand
                                                               section in the Yellow Pup well. The average porosity of
             oil in  the mud  circulated  up from the  basement  rocks   this sandstone is 21%. A 6-mi2 area of onlap trap incorpo­
             during coring operations on OC5-Y -0430 #1 on Chugach.   rating  one-half of this net  sand interval  could hold  160
             Based on the  composition of this oil, Elf inferred  that  it   bcf of gas. We estimated that 133 bcf of gas would reach
             was not generated  in the  nonmarine  source  material of   the reservoir  interval on  the South Teton prospect. This
             the Stuart subbasin area. The hydrocarbon accumulation   quantity is much less than the 400 bcf of gas estimated to
             giving  rise to  the  oil show  was judged to be of  small   be the amount that  could  be held in  onlap traps in  the
             volume and of no commercial significance.         two  reservoir intervals on  the South  Teton  prospect.
               We  reviewed  the  wire line  logs  and  mud  logs  and   Thus, the failure of gas to reach the crestal trap on South
             found no  evidence for gas in any sandstones  in any of   Teton is considered  to  be consistent  with  the  prediction
             the five wells. All gas shows on the mud logs could  be   suggested by petroleum system logic.
             correlated with coals.                              The  two wells drilled  on  the Chugach prospect
                The  evaluation of  the  prospects  using petroleum   provided us with the stratigraphic information needed to
             system  logic  predicted  that  there would not be  thermal   estimate the volume of both  the crestal trap  and an onlap
             gas accumulations on Cascade or Yellow Pup. Therefore,   trap near the blue level. Well OCS-Y-0430  located
             the  failure of  the  wells on  these  two prospects was   downdip  of the crest penetrated a  thick package of
             predicted. However, accumulations of thermal gas were   mostly  seal  rocks  above an  interval  that  contains
             predicted to exist on South Teton and Chugach. Unfortu­  n u merous  sandstones  extending  from  3952  ft  to
             nately,  the  structural  and stratigraphic characteristics of   economic basement. The crest of the shallow structure is
             these  prospects  were  such  that  the exact locations of   cut by a fault with a throw that decreases from about 350
             these  accumulations  could  not  be  predicted. As  we   ft  near  the  crest to  zero. This fault would limit  the  areas
             showed in the preceding section, using the COST-2 well   of the accumulations in the lower sandstones because of
             stratigraphy, we could account for both the predicted gas   sand-sand  contact  across  the  fault  and  would  allow
             volumes  (133  bcf on  South  Teton  and  987  bcf  on   vertical migration  up  to  the first good seal that  extends
             Chugach)  and the dry holes.  Let  us  determine  whether   from 3952 to 3625 ft. To estimate the volume that might
             we can still reconcile the predicted gas volumes with the   be trapped in this crestal trap updip of well ocs-Y -0430,
             dry holes  using  the  additional  stratigraphic information   we assumed a common water level of  4252 ft in all  the
             available from the wells drilled on the prospects.   sandstones  between  4252 and  3952 ft. This places  the
               The  stratigraphic  section  penetrated  by each of  these   gas-water  contact about  20 ft above  the  level  at which
             wells is  shown  in  Figure 2.21. All of the wells bottomed   the hypothesized pay sandstone at 3952 ft is penetrated
             in economic basement rocks and penetrated a sandstone   in  well  OCS-Y-0430.  There is 85 ft of  sandstone  in this
             reservoir  above  basement  that  was  overlain  by  a  seal   300-ft-thick interval with an average porosity of 35%. We
             rock The well on South Teton was drilled on a basement   estimate that with a common water level this crestal trap
             high  and  did  not  penetrate  the  stratigraphic  section   could hold 270 bcf without any gas extending downdip
             within which basement onlap  traps might  occur.  We   to well OC5-Y-0430.
             chose the Yellow Pup well for our source of stratigraphic   well ocs-y -0425 was drilled to test a potentially large
             information for estimating the potential capacity of onlap   onlap trap on the Chugach prospect. The well penetrated
             traps on South Teton.  This  choice  was  based on  the   a sandstone-rich  section  extending  from  5608 ft to the
             proximity of the Yellow Pup well, the inferred direction   basement beneath a good seal approximately 140ft thick.
             of  sediment  transport,  and  the  seismic evidence  for   Thus,  the  conditions  were  excellent  for  an onlap trap.
             interval thicknesses and bed character.           The upper 113 ft of  the sandstone  section  contained  97
               In  the Yellow  Pup  well,  numerous sandstones  occur   net-ft of sandstone with an average porosity of  21%. We
             in the interval from about  5000 to 6000 ft followed by a   estimate that an onlap trap that included this sandstone
             400-ft-thick seal  rock  and a  second  interval  with
             numerous sandstones from 6420 ft to the basement rock   with the area shown in Figure 2.20 could hold 1130 bcf of
             Correcting for the elevation  of the derrick floor and the   gas.  Thus,  the  total  volume of  trapped  gas  calculated
             structural difference between the OCS-Y -0407 well on   using  the  observed  stratigraphy  and  the trap areas
             Yellow Pup and the South Teton onlap, we would expect   proposed  in  Figure  2.20 is 1400 bcf  compared  to an
             to have onlap traps with elevations of about 700 ft below   estimated  available volume of 987 bcf. Again, we find
             the blue level and near the blue level.           that  the  prediction  made  using  the  petroleum system
               In the  Yellow Pup  well, a  370-ft-thick interval across   logic is consistent  with  the  results observed  upon
             the blue level  contains  68 net-ft  of  sandstone with an   drilling.
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59