Page 188 - The Professionalisation of Political Communication Chaning Media, Changing Europe Volume 3
P. 188

Political Communication.qxd  12/7/06  7:30 pm  Page 185
        Political Communication.qxd  5/1/07  15:06  Page 187




                                             THE PROFESSIONALISATION OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION |  185


                   parents will have no clue as to how to do this, formal and informal (through the media)
                   teaching options should be on offer at accessible times, locations and costs. It would be
                   a great contribution to the democratisation of Europe if all the presently available
                   professional talent in political communication could re-directed towards the
                  professional talent in political communication could be re-directed towards the
                   development of a robust democratic perspective for Europe.
                  development of a robust democratic perspective for Europe.
                   Professional political communications fulfils clear functions within ‘thin’ democracies. If,
                   however, societies decide for a strong model of democracy, they will need all the
                   professionalism they can muster to engage in the grand-scale teaching of democratic
                   minds. The fact that this type of professionalism is today not considered the absolute
                   top political priority in European countries does not augur well for the future of
                   European democracies.


                   REFERENCES
                   Barber,B.R.(2003[1984]) Strong Democracy.Berkeley:University of California Press.
                   Bennett,W.L.& R.Entman,(eds) (2001) Mediated Politics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
                   Gandy, O.H. (2001) ‘Dividing Practices: Segmentation and Targeting in the Emerging Public
                    Sphere’, pp. 141–159 in W.L. Bennett & R. Entman (eds). Mediated Politics. Cambridge:
                    Cambridge University Press.
                   Zakaria,F.(2004) The Future of Freedom New York:W.W.Norton.

                   ADDITIONAL MATERIAL OF RELEVANCE
                   Bennett, W.L. & J.B. Manheim (2001) ‘The Big Spin: Strategic Communication and the
                    Transformation of Pluralist Democracy’, pp. 279–298 in W.L. Bennett & R. Entman (eds).
                    Mediated Politics.Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.
                   Blumler, J.G. & M. Gurevitch (2001) ‘“Americanization” Reconsidered: U.K.-U.S. Campaign
                    Communication Comparisons Across Time’, pp. 380–403 in W.L. Bennett, & R. Entman (eds).
                    Mediated Politics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
                   Entman, R.M. & W.L. Bennett (2001) ‘Communication in the Future of Democracy: A Conclusion’,
                    pp. 468–480 in W.L. Bennett & R. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge
                    University Press.
                   Gans,H.(2003) Democracy and News.Oxford:Oxford University Press.                The Professionalisation of Political Communication: Democracy at Stake?
                   Gould,C.G.(1988) Rethinking Democracy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
                   Hamelink, C.J. (1995) ‘The democratic ideal and its enemies’, pp. 15–37 in Philip Lee (ed.). The
                    Democratization of ommunication. Cardiff:University of Wales Press.
                   Ober,J.(1989) Man and Elite in Democratic Athens.Princeton:Princeton University Press.  187
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193