Page 146 - The Six Sigma Project Planner
P. 146

Prepare an Audit Report
                    After receiving the response from the process owner, the audit team should prepare a
                    written audit report. The audit report should document the findings of the audit team,
                    including recommendations for remedial action, actions already taken or planned by
                    the process owner, the names of persons responsible for the action items, and deadlines
                    for completing each action items.
                    The audit follow-up plan can be considered a subproject. The report should first be
                    presented to the process owner and then revised if necessary. The final report should be
                    presented to the entire Six Sigma project team for approval. Upon approval by the team,
                    a summary report should be sent to the project sponsor. The Summary Audit Report, or
                    its location, should be included in the Appendix of the  Planner in the Audit Report
                    section on p. 207.

                    Determine Sigma and DPMO Levels for CTx’s

                    Critical-to-quality characteristics are measured in terms of defects per million
                    opportunities. CTQs and DPMO criteria were established previously, in the Define
                    phase (p. 106). We will now analyze these metrics.
                    At this point in the Six Sigma project, data are collected and the exact quality levels
                    determined for all CTQ characteristics and for many CTC and CTS characteristics. This
                    information will help us with our move forward planning by telling us if the existing
                    business process has the potential to deliver quality levels that meet our project goals. It
                    also tells us what the process is actually delivering. By comparing these two values, we
                    can measure the actual-potential gap. Actual and potential performance must also be
                    compared with the best practices performance levels determined in the future state
                    description (p. 144).

                    Process Capability and Process Actual Sigma Levels for
                    Continuous CTx Characteristics
                    For CTx’s measured on a continuous scale, we will use calculated sigma levels to
                    measure process performance, e.g., a sigma level of 6 would indicate 3.4 PPM per-
                    formance. We call data obtained for CTx’s measured on a continuous scale variables data.

                                                                       3
                    Measuring Process Capability for Variables Data
                    Imagine a process operated in a state of perfect statistical control. For a variable CTx,
                    this state is operationalized when the X-bar and range or sigma charts indicate no
                    special causes for an extended period of time. In Six Sigma analysis, when this stable
                    state exists, the process capability is measured by using the process mean and standard
                    deviation and assuming a 1.5σ shift will take place in the long term. Process reject rates

                    3
                     Note: Although capability indices (Cpk, etc.) are equivalent to Z-scores, we will not discuss process
                    capability indices here. For more information on relating Z statistics to these indices, see The Six Sigma
                    Handbook, Chapter 13.


                                                             129
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151