Page 80 - Theory and Design of Air Cushion Craft
P. 80

64  Air  cushion theory



                     2.0
                                        Exponential theory     MARIC
                                         A. A. West           Plenum chamber theory
                                                              with flow coefficient  of 0.53





                            0.5            1.0           1.5            2.0 hit

              Fig. 2.13  Comparison of  air flow coefficient  between various theories: exponential theory; A. A. West theory;
              MARIC theory; plenum  chamber theory with air flow  rate coefficient  of 0.53.


                follows  the  angle  of  the  wall  of  the  finger,  consequently  contracting  the  cushion
                outflow jet  so as to reduce the cushion flow rate.
                  From the figure the  greatest  difference  in p t  is found between the test results and
                the results calculated  by the exponential formula and  the West formula in the  case
                of large hit values. However, all of them will be closer in the case of  smaller hit. The
                test  result  for  the  cushion  lift  coefficient  (Fig.  2.14)  is higher  than that  calculated
                from  the exponential and A. A. West's theories, because  the experiments  accurately
                simulate the losses through  the feed  holes  of  bag-finger  skirts and  the weak  effects
                of  the jet  enclosing the walls.
              6.  The  effect  of  the skirt material on the  static air cushion  performance.  Reference  13
                listed eight test samples with different  materials which are shown  in Table 2.5. The
                test results showed the  effect  of  specific weight of  skirt material on the  static  shape
                of skirts.
                  It  is found that  skirt  material  characteristics  do  not  greatly  affect  the  static air
                cushion performance in the case of  any given configuration and  hovering height of
                the  skirts. The  effect  of  skirt  material  characteristics  on  the  hovering  height  can
                therefore  normally  be neglected  and  the hovering height can be measured directly
                during tests. The  effect  of  specific  weight of  skirts on  the  geometric  shape  will be
                described  in Chapter  7. From such tests it is also found that the  effect  of elasticity
                of  skirt material  on  the  shape  of  the  skirt is weak.


              Table 2.5  Experimental samples of  skirt for various skirt materials  [14]

              Model  Scale   Width of  air duct/  Equivalent nozzle  Skirt material  Test
                     ratio  A  width of  bag  width/0.095                     equipment
              1      1       0.625          1             95 14 Rubber core   Large rig
              2      1       1              1             95 14 Rubber core   Large rig
              3      1/2     1              1             6408 Rubber core    Large rig
              4      1/2     1              1/2           6408 Rubber core    Large rig
              5      1/2     1              1/2            1533 Rubber single  Large rig
                                                            surface coating
              6      1/2     1              1              1533 Rubber single  Large rig
                                                            surface coating
              7      1/8.9   1              1/8.9         Plastic diaphragm   Small rig
              8      1/8.9   1              1/8.9         95 14 Rubber core   Small rig
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85