Page 78 - Theory and Design of Air Cushion Craft
P. 78

62  Air  cushion  theory

                vorticity, even though the range of  vortices is rather large. Simultaneously, the test
                cushion pressure distributes uniformly.
             •  According  to analysis of the streamline  charts,  it is found that  the location  of  the
                feed  holes in the  bag  will  affect  the jet flow enclosing length and  consequently  the
                air cushion performance.
                                                                                  may
                  For this reason, an optimum hole location xlB and relative area of hole S/B b
                be  found. The  best  location  is generally  close  to  the  segment  upper  attachment,
                though  some experimentation  is necessary  for optimization,  once the  overall skirt
                section has been  designed. This is always a worthwhile exercise.
             •  Owing to the enclosing effect  of the jet flow assisting sealing of the air cushion, this
                is equivalent to  a reduced flow coefficient  during leakage of  air  from  a  small hole
                to  the  atmosphere,  consequently the  approach  will  be to  concentrate  on  defining
                the relative flow coefficient m and cushion pressure coefficient/^  at different  ground
                clearances  (air gap under  skirt tip).


              Experimental   results  and  analysis

             The  loss of  air  (leakage) between the  skirt  and  box wall has to  be considered,  which
             leads to the equivalent  air clearance  of  the skirt h, and  can be written as

                                            h  = h 0  + h'
             where h Q is the actual  air clearance  of  the skirt, namely, the vertical distance between
             the  lower edge of  the skirt finger and  the ground,  and  h'  the equivalent air  clearance
             of  skirt considering  the  air  leakage loss between  the skirt and  box wall as well as  the
             gap  between  the fingers. The  air  leakage therefore has  to  be corrected  in the  case of
             fitting  a  regression line for  cushion flow derived  from  the  test  results.  The  following
             observations  were made at MARIC:
              1.  It  was found that  the  test  results are concentrated,  having a  small standard  devia-
                tion,  which was also  verified  by test  results gathered  for another  series which  was
                carried  out  one  year  later.  The  test  data  were considered  stable  and  the  selected
                parameters to be  reasonable.
             2.  For  a conventional  bag  and  finger  type skirt, with parameters  such  as H {/H 2  = 1;
                x/B  = 0.512; S/B b  =  0.0289; the cushion  pressure coefficient^,  cushion flow rate
                coefficient ra, bag and  cushion pressure ratio p t  and  cushion lift  power coefficient  N
                can  be regressed to  the  following expressions (see Figs 2.12,  1.14 and  1.26):
                                                            4 3
                                   PC  =  PJ4j  =  0.602 (/z/0~° °              (2.22)
                                   A  =  P c/Pt  =  0.638 (h/ty OA9             (2.23)
                while

                       h/t<\.05    m  =  m/(p ap cf 5  =  0.625 (hit]  -0.415  (2.24a)
                       h/t>l.Q5     m  =  m/(p ap c) 05  =  0.848 -  0.147 (hit)  (2.24b)
                       hit  =  1.05  ra  =  m^pzPc) 05  =  average of (equations  2.24a and b)

                These  expressions are suitable for hit between 0.4 and  2.5; alternatively, the  follow-
                ing may be used:
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83