Page 314 - Thermal Hydraulics Aspects of Liquid Metal Cooled Nuclear Reactors
P. 314

284                   Thermal Hydraulics Aspects of Liquid Metal Cooled Nuclear Reactors


                     1

                    0.8


                    0.6
                  C t1
                    0.4



                    0.2

                     0
                      0      2e+07    4e+07    6e+07    8e+07     1e+08
                                           Re*Pr

         Fig. 6.2.1.6 Graphical representation of a correlation for C t1 (Shams et al., 2014).
            5                                6
                DNS                              DNS
                Low Re K-epsilon model       5   Low Re K-epsilon model
            4
                AHFM-2005                        AHFM-2005
                AHFM-NRG                         AHFM-NRG
                                             4
            3
           T +                               T +  3
            2
                                             2
            1
                                             1
            0                                0
                1       10       100     1000  1        10        100      1000
                           y +                              y +
         Fig. 6.2.1.7 Evolution of temperature profile for a channel for Pr¼0.025 at (left) Re τ ¼395 and
         (right) Re τ ¼640 (Shams et al., 2014).

         The use of this correlation brings significant improvements in the prediction of the
         heat transfer for low Prandtl fluids, especially in the forced convection flow regimes.
         Fig. 6.2.1.7 displays the evolution of temperature for two different turbulent channel
         flows, that is, Re τ ¼395 and 640 at Pr¼0.025. It is clearly noticeable that among the
         tested models, the AHFM-NRG has shown significant improvement and displays a
         good agreement with the reference DNS database. In addition to the planar channel
         flows, the AHFM-NRG was also tested for a turbulent wavy channel flow. Once again,
         the AHFM-NRG has shown good agreement with the reference data (Shams et al.,
         2014). It is important to realize that even if the performance of this model for the con-
         sidered test cases so far has been good, these test cases are fairly simple compared with
         the reactor-scale applications. Therefore, the model will need validation with more
         test cases and reactor-scale applications. In this respect, further validation of the
         AHFM-NRG is foreseen to be performed within the framework of the SESAME
         and the MYRTE projects.
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319