Page 168 - Vogel's TEXTBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
P. 168

4   ERRORS AND  STATlSTlCS

         Had  the calculated  value for  t  been  less than  1.80 then  there  would  have
       been  no  significance  in  the  results  and  no  apparent  bias  in  the  laboratory
       procedure,  as  the  tables  would  have  indicated  a  probability  of  greater  than
       1 in 10 of obtaining that value. It should be pointed out that these values refer
       to  what  is  known  as  a  double-sided,  or  two-tailed,  distribution  because  it
       concerns probabilities of  values both less and greater than the mean. In some
       calculations an analyst may only be  interested in  one of  these two  cases, and
       under these conditions the t-test  becomes single-tailed so that the probability
       from the tables is halved.
       (b) F-test.  This  is  used  to  compare  the  precisions  of  two  sets  of  data,2
       for example, the results of two different analytical methods or the results from
       two different laboratories. It is calculated from the equation:




         N.B. The larger value of s is always used as the numerator so that the value
       of F is always greater than unity. The value obtained for F is then checked for
       its significance against values in the F-table calculated from an F-distribution
       (Appendix 13) corresponding to the numbers of degrees of freedom for the two
       sets of  data.

       Example  5.  F-test comparison of  precisions.
         The standard deviation  from  one set  of  11 determinations was  s,  = 0.210,
       and the standard deviation from another 13 determinations was s,  = 0.641. 1s
       there any significant difference between the precision of these two sets of results?
         From equation (3)




       for




       The first value (2.28) corresponds to  10 per cent probability, the second value
       (2.91) to 5 percent probability and the third value (4.71) to 1 percent probability.
         Under  these  conditions  there  is  less  than  one  chance  in  100 that  these
       precisions  are similar.  To put  it  another way, the  difference between  the  two
       sets of  data is highly significant.
         Had the value of  F turned out to be less than 2.28 then it would  have been
       possible to Say that there was no significant difference between  the precisions,
       at the  10 per cent level.


       4.13  COMPARISON OF THE  MEANS OF TWO SAMPLES
       When a new analytical method is being developed it is usual practice to compare
       the values of the mean and precision of the new (test) method with those of  an
       established  (reference) procedure.
          The value of t when comparing two sample means 2, and 2,  is given by the
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173