Page 412 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 412

386                                                     COMPONENT DESIGN


          reduces over time during a fatigue test – hence the need to specify that the strain
          range is measured at the start of the test.)
            The fatigue behaviour of composites depends on both the stress range and the
          mean stress level, which can both be described in terms of the maximum stress,
          ó max , and the ratio of minimum to maximum stress, R. It is convenient initially to
          consider fatigue behaviour under reverse loading, i.e., with R ¼ 1, for which the
          mean stress is zero, and then relate behaviour at other R ratios to it.
            The constant amplitude fatigue behaviour of glass-fibre composites can best be
          characterized by a linear relationship between the logarithm of the number of cycles
          and the logarithm of the stress or strain amplitude, viz:

              å ¼ å 0 N  1=m  or N ¼ Kå  m  where K ¼ (å 0 ) m  or log N ¼ log K   m log å  (7:6)

          Echtermeyer, Hayman and Ronold (1996) carried out a regression analysis on a total
          of 111 constant amplitude, reverse loading fatigue test results for 10 different
          laminates tested at DnV, assuming that they all conformed to the same å–N curve,
          and obtained values for å 0 , log K and m of 2.84 percent, 3.552 and 7.838 respectively,
          with a standard deviation of log N of 0.437. The DnV regression line is compared
          with another derived from 19 tests on a 08/þ458,  458 laminate at ECN, giving
          å 0 ¼ 2:34 percent, log K ¼ 3:775 and m ¼ 10:204, in Figure 7.5. The researchers did
          not constrain the regression lines to pass through the strain value at either UTS or
          UCS at log N ¼ 0(ca 2.4 percent and 2.0 percent); had they done so the DnV line
          would have had a shallower slope, i.e., a larger value of m. After comparison with
          regressions on other fatigue test datasets, they concluded that the DnV line
          provided a reasonable basis for initial design.

               3


              2.5
                         DnV:   log N = 3.552 - 7.838 log(strain)
               2
             Initial strain amplitude (%)  1.5





               1
                                                         ECN:   log N = 3.775 - 10.204 log (strain)

              0.5


               0
                0       1       2       3        4       5       6       7       8
                                          Log (No. of loading cycles)
          Figure 7.5 Strain-life Regression Lines Fitted to Results of Constant Amplitude, Reverse
          Loading Fatigue Tests on GFRP Composites
   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417