Page 420 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 420

394                                                     COMPONENT DESIGN


            The blade loadings are calculated using empirical three-dimensional aerofoil data
          taken from Petersen et al. (1998) – see Figure 5.9. This displays a gentler stall than
          typical two-dimensional data, so there is no significant reduction in blade out-of-
          plane bending moment as the blade goes into stall. Above about 20 m/s, the out-of-
          plane bending moment begins to increase progressively once again as drag begins
          to become significant. The predicted variation of blade 12 m radius out-of-plane
          bending moment with wind speed is plotted out for a 0.2 shear exponent and a
          range of yaw angles on Figure 7.9, with the yaw direction defined as positive when
          the lateral component of air flow with respect to the rotor disc is in the same
          direction as the blade movement at zero azimuth (i.e., at 12 o’clock). The effect of
          this increase in relative velocity outweighs that of the reduction of angle of attack at
          wind speeds beyond stall, so the bending moment at 08 azimuth is increased by
          negative yaw. Maximum moments occur at negative yaw angles and 08 azimuth
          rather than at positive yaw angles and 1808 azimuth, because wind shear augments
          the wind speed in the former case. Also plotted is the variation of bending moment
          with wind speed for a 138 shaft tilt with respect to flow and 908 azimuth, which is
          the critical configuration for load cases not involving a change in wind direction.
            Considering the deterministic load cases 1.3 and 1.5 to 1.9 initially, it is interesting
          to note that the maximum out-of-plane bending moments lie within a relatively close
          range in four of the six cases. It should be pointed out that, in the grid-loss case, the
          bending moment depends on the rotor acceleration after loss of load, which is largely
          determined by rotor inertia and the time delay to tip brake deployment. The bending
          moment quoted is a notional one, based on a generous 1.5 s time delay until full
          deployment and an inertia value calculated for a fibreglass rotor. With lighter rotors,


              160


                                                             50  yaw,
              140    Full-line curves are for 0 deg azimuth   0  azimuth    20  yaw,
              12 m radius out-of-plane bending moment (kNm)  100   40  yaw,  0  yaw, 180  azimuth  azimuth
                         Shear exponent = 0.2
                        Rotational speed = 30 r.p.m.
                                                                           0  azimuth
              120
                                                                            13  tilt,
                                                                              90
                                                                      0  yaw,
                                   0  azimuth
                                                                     0  azimuth
               80
               60
               40

               20                                  40  yaw, 180  azimuth   20  yaw, 180  azimuth

                0
                 0      5      10     15     20     25     30     35     40      45
                                            Wind speed (m/s)
          Figure 7.9 Variation of 12 m Radius Out-of-plane Bending Moment with Wind Speed at
          Various Yaw Angles for an Example 40 m Diameter Stall-regulated Machine with TR Blades
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425