Page 52 - Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach
P. 52

Guo, Boyun / Computer Assited Petroleum Production Engg 0750682701_chap03 Final Proof page 42 3.1.2007 8:30pm Compositor Name: SJoearun




               3/42  PETROLEUM PRODUCTION ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS
                                0
               Solution The value of J at 1,500 psia is  References
                                o
                                                         bandakhlia, h. and aziz, k. Inflow performance relation-
                        0       4  1,500
                       J ¼ 5   10                          ship for solution-gas drive horizontal wells. Presented
                        o         2,000
                                                           at the 64th SPE Annual Technical Conference and
                                             2
                         ¼ 3:75   10  4  stb=day (psia) ,  Exhibition held 8–11 October 1989, in San Antonio,
                           0
               and the value of J at 1,000 psia is         Texas. Paper SPE 19823.
                           o
                                                         chang, m. Analysis of inflow performance simulation of
                  0       4  1,000       4         2
                 J ¼ 5   10      ¼ 2:5   10  stb=day(psia) :  solution-gas drive for horizontal/slant vertical wells.
                  o
                            2,000
                                                           Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meet-
                                  0
               Using the above values for J and the accompanying p e in  ing held 18–21 May 1992, in Casper, Wyoming. Paper
                                  o
               Eq. (3.46), the following data points are calculated:  SPE 24352.
                                                         dietz, d.n. Determination of average reservoir pressure
                p e ¼ 2,000 psig  p e ¼ 1,500 psig  p e ¼ 1,000 psig  from build-up surveys. J. Pet. Tech. 1965; August.
                                                         dake, l.p. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. New
                       q             q             q
                p wf         p wf          p wf            York: Elsevier, 1978.
               ðpsigÞ  (stb/day)  ðpsigÞ  (stb/day)  ðpsigÞ  (stb/day)
                                                         earlougher, r.c. Advances in Well Test Analysis. Dallad:
               2,000     0   1,500    0    1,000    0      Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1977.
               1,800   380   1,350  160     900    48    el-banbi, a.h. and wattenbarger, r.a. Analysis of com-
               1,600   720   1,200  304     800    90      mingled tight gas reservoirs. Presented at the SPE
               1,400  1,020  1,050  430     700   128      Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held 6–
               1,200  1,280   900   540     600   160      9 October 1996, in Denver, Colorado. Paper SPE
               1,000  1,500   750   633     500   188      36736.
                800   1,680   600   709     400   210
                                                         el-banbi, a.h. and wattenbarger, r.a. Analysis of com-
                600   1,820   450   768     300   228
                400   1,920   300   810     200   240      mingled gas reservoirs with variable bottom-hole flow-
                200   1,980   150   835     100   248      ing pressure and non-Darcy flow. Presented at the SPE
                  0   2,000     0   844       0   250      Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held 5–8
                                                           October 1997, in San Antonio, Texas. Paper SPE
                                                           38866.
                IPR curves are plotted in Fig. 3.20.
                                                         fetkovich, m.j. The isochronal testing of oil wells. Pre-
                                                           sented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and
               Summary                                     Exhibition held 30 September–3 October 1973, Las
               This chapter presented and illustrated various mathemat-  Vegas, Nevada. Paper SPE 4529.
               ical models for estimating deliverability of oil and gas  joshi, s.d. Augmentation of well productivity with slant
               reservoirs. Production engineers should make selections  and horizontal wells. J. Petroleum Technol. 1988;
               of the models based on the best estimate of his/her reser-  June:729–739.
               voir conditions, that is, flow regime and pressure level. The  retnanto, a. and economides, m. Inflow performance
               selected models should be validated with actual well pro-
               duction rate and bottom-hole pressure. At least one test  relationships of horizontal and multibranched wells in
               point is required to validate a straight-line (single-liquid  a solution gas drive reservoir. Presented at the 1998
               flow) IPR model. At least two test points are required to  SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held
               validate a curvic (single-gas flow or two-phase flow) IPR  27–30 September 1998, in New Orleans, Louisiana.
               model.                                      Paper SPE 49054.
                             2,500
                                                          Reservoir pressure = 2,000 psig
                                                          Reservoir pressure = 1,500 psig
                             2,000
                                                          Reservoir pressure = 1,000 psig
                           p wf  (psig)  1,500

                             1,000


                              500


                                0
                                 0        500       1,000     1,500    2,000     2,500
                                                       q (stb/day)
                                     Figure 3.20 IPR curves for Example Problem 3.7.
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57