Page 205 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 205

196                               3. NOISE IN MARINE SEISMICS



























           FIG. 3.26  Two stack sections with guided wave effects (dashed blue polygons).


           using these prestack processing techniques.  is close enough to the receiving streamer, the
           Fig. 3.26 shows two different stack sections con-  interference signal has a hyperbolic moveout. If
           taminated with strong guided wave effect in  it is located at a long distance, then we observe
           their shallow parts, consisting of very steep dis-  the interfering signal as linear events. In shot
           continuous line segments. In such cases, the only  gathers in Fig. 3.27, the interference, possibly
           way to remove them is to mute out the guided  originating from a boomer source, has a linear
           waves from shots using a surgical mute.      moveout since source is located at a very long
                                                        distance away from the receiving streamer. The
                                                        time between the successive interference signals
               3.9 SEISMIC INTERFERENCE                 is 1.6 s. After shot number 109, shooting at the
                                                        recording vessel was stopped because of the
              Seismic interference from other seismic ves-  strong interference, but the recording continued
           sels shooting close to the survey area may be an  to see the character of the interfering noise.
           importantissue duringthe acquisition. Since sea-  Between shots 110 and 114, records show only
           water is a very good conductor for elastic waves,  the interference signal.
           the echoes from large air gun arrays used by the  In tectonically active regions, such as at sub-
           oil and gas industry today can be perceived by  duction zones, a special case of seismic interfer-
           the hydrophones from several tens of miles away  ence may be local earthquakes, appearing as
           from the seismic source. This type of seismic  strong coherent events on the shot records; they
           interference has very good trace-by-trace consis-  are usually removed by muting. Fig. 3.28, shows
           tency on the shot records, and appears at regular  an interesting example of an earthquake inter-
           time intervals on the shot records, depending on  ference on a 3D shot record group consisting of
           the shooting rate at the source of noise. Its shape  eight streamers. The interference is so strong that
           varies with the distance between receiving   the records are considered to be bad shots and
           streamer and source of interference. If the source  should be edited during the processing stage.
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210