Page 531 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 531

522                                 11. SEISMIC MIGRATION

           NMO and stacking procedures are skipped and  time arise in the semblance plots during the
           a prestack migration can be preferred to obtain a  velocity analysis (Fig. 11.32C). In the example
           more correct subsurface image.               semblance plot in Fig. 11.32C, the reflection
              If there are intersecting reflectors with differ-  hyperbolas indicated by A and B have velocities
           ent inclination angles in the subsurface (indi-  of 1500 and 2000 m/s, respectively, even though
           cated by I and II in Fig. 11.32A), that is,  both reflection signals propagate in the same
           conflicting dips, these structures cannot be  constant velocity layer (V 1 in Fig. 11.32A).
           resolved by applying a conventional poststack   If conflicting dips exist in the data, it may
           migration followed by NMO correction-stacking  not be possible to pick an individual velocity
           flow. These reflectors form two individual   for each particular reflection event. In velocity
           reflection hyperbolas with different moveout  analysis of conflicting dips, generally the veloc-
           curvatures in CDP gathers, and hence different  ity is picked at the point consistent with the over-
           apparent velocities since the NMO velocity of  all trend of the semblance contours, which
           a reflection is dip dependent. The issue here is  means that only one reflection hyperbola of the
           that both hyperbolas have the same zero-offset  same zero-offset time will be perfectly flattened.
           time   t(0),  as  schematically  shown   in  Fig. 11.33 schematically shows this situation.
           Fig. 11.32B. In this case, two enclosures at differ-  If the velocity at point A (1500 m/s) is picked,
           ent velocities but exactly at the same zero-offset  the event A is flattened and B is overcorrected


































           FIG. 11.32  (A) Ray paths of the signal from source to receiver in the case of subsurface reflectors with conflicting dips
           (reflector pieces indicated by I and II). (B) In such cases, two individual reflection hyperbolas with different curvatures
           but the same t(0) time are obtained in CDP gathers. (C) Since the stacking velocities are dip dependent, two enclosures indi-
           cating two different velocities corresponding to the same t(0) time occur in the semblance plots, preventing the picking of only
           one velocity value for time t(0).
   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536