Page 534 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 534

11.8 DEPTH MIGRATION                            525

           velocities have been developed utilizing a least-  equation migrations utilize the numerical solu-
           squares approximation using a vertically vary-  tion of the acoustic wave equation, Kirchhoff
           ing velocity field, termed constrained velocity  and Beam migrations employ ray approxima-
           inversion. Unlike time migrations, velocity  tions. Even though Kirchhoff depth migrations
           errors in shallow areas of the seismic data  have been preferred by the seismic industry
           induce migration errors also in deeper parts of  until the last decade, reverse time migration is
           the data in depth migrations, which require  becoming more and more popular, since it pro-
           building the interval velocity-depth model very  vides more accurate solutions in complex sub-
           carefully, even iteratively from shallow to deep.  surface settings, though it is relatively more
              Depth migration can be achieved using dif-  expensive compared to the ray-based depth
           ferent implementations, such as wave-equation,  migration algorithms.
           Kirchhoff, Beam, finite-difference or reverse   Although the time migration results can eas-
           time algorithms, all of which allow ray bending  ily be compared to the stack sections, since they
           at the reflecting surface and are significantly  are both in the time domain, this is not possible
           slow to run, but produce more accurate images  for depth migration results. In addition, time
           in depth. Depth migrations account for lateral  migration algorithms generally compensate for
           velocity variations and can be achieved using  the minor, even moderate, errors in the input
           different implementations, which can be classi-  velocity model; depth migration algorithms
           fied by regarding how they propagate the wave  are much more sensitive to the errors in the
           field in the model. While reverse time and wave  interval velocity field. Fig. 11.35 compares



































           FIG. 11.35  (A) Kirchhoff time migration result of the stack section given in Fig. 11.30A, (B) depth converted version of
           (A) using RMS velocities, (C) Kirchhoff poststack depth migration result, and (D) finite-difference poststack depth migration
           result.
   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539