Page 533 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 533

524                                 11. SEISMIC MIGRATION
























           FIG. 11.34  Comparisonof the results from (A) poststackand (B) prestacktime migrations applied toa shallow marine survey.


              Poststack and prestack time migration results  subsurface as the input, and they do not allow
           of a marine survey are compared in Fig. 11.34.  ray bending at a reflecting surface. Lateral posi-
           Prestack migration produces superior results:  tioning errors arising from time migrations are
           fault planes are much clearer and steeply dip-  expressed by image ray, which is normal to the
           ping events like the sediments at the central part  recording surfaces and bends across the subsur-
           of the section are more distinct in the prestack  face layers. Although time migration methods
           time migration image. However, the method is  produce a migrated image very fast, in principle,
           expensive since, for instance, in order to migrate  their results must be considered as imperfect, and
           120-fold seismic data, 120 successive migration  they can supply an image of the subsurface for an
           applications are required and the results are  initial interpretation or testing purposes for the
           summed, that is, it takes 120 times longer than  parameters, which can be utilized later in more
           a conventional poststack imaging. However, it  complicated migration algorithms, such as pre-
           retains the information of amplitude versus off-  stack depth migration applications.
           set (AVO) and phase variations in the prestack  Depth migration algorithms are, however,
           data for a possible hydrocarbon analysis after  much more complicated and require a more
           migration.                                   accurate interval velocity field of the subsurface
                                                        in the depth domain. RMS velocity fields are
                                                        therefore converted into interval velocities in
                 11.8 DEPTH MIGRATION                   depth using the Dix equation. However, the
                                                        Dix equation sometimes produces inaccurate
              Most of the migration algorithms produce the  and unreliable interval velocities since it is an
           image of the subsurface with a vertical axis in  empirical approach. When converted into inter-
           time, while the others provide final images with  val velocities using the Dix equation, even an
           a vertical axis in depth. These migration algo-  erroneous RMS velocity pick results in a com-
           rithms are referred to as time and depth migra-  plete degradation of the whole depth migration
           tions, respectively. Time migration algorithms  process. Therefore, a number of approaches to
           require a simple RMS velocity field of the   invert the interval velocity field from RMS
   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538