Page 200 - Adsorbents fundamentals and applications
P. 200

INTERACTIONS OF ADSORBATE WITH CATIONS  185

            Table 7.5. Interaction energies (φ) between molecules and isolated cations
                                       30
                              24
            Molecule   r    10 α     10 χ      Q    −(φ D + φ R )  −φ Ind  −φ total
                                      3
            or Ion     ˚ A   cm 3   cm /molc   esu    kJ/mol     kJ/mol  kJ/mol
            Ar        1.92   1.63         0
            O(O 2 )   1.73   1.58        −1.3
            N(N 2 )   1.89   1.74        −4.7

            Ar-Ion:
            Li +      0.78   0.029  −0.99      0    0.21         21.3    21.5
            Na +      0.98   0.180  −6.95      0    0.67         16.0    16.6
            K +       1.33   0.840  −27.54     0    1.80         10.2    12.0
            Ca 2+     0.99   0.471  −22.1      0    2.13         63.5    65.6
            Sr 2+     1.13   0.863  −46.17     0    3.26         52.7    55.9
            Ba 2+     1.35   1.560  −76.4      0    4.22         40.7    44.9

            O 2 -Li +                                                    32
            O 2 -Na +                                                    20
            N 2 -Li +                                                    51
            N 2 -Na +                                                    36

            α = polarizability, χ = magnetic susceptibility, and Q = quadrupole moment.
            Values for O 2 and N 2 are taken from Mellot and Ligniers (1997) and all others are from Barrer
            (1978). Van der Waals radius and ionic radius are denoted by r.N 2 -ion and O 2 -ion are in linear
            arrangements.


              Table 7.5 shows the interaction energies of Ar, O 2 ,and N 2 interacting with
            isolated cations. For Ar, Eqs. 2.4–2.8 were used (Barrer and Stuart, 1959). For
            O 2 and N 2 , the energies were calculated by Mellot and Lignieres (1997) from
            quantum mechanics that represent the sums of the L-J and electrostatic interac-
            tions. For the Ar-cation pairs, as the cation increases in size, the polarizability
            increases, hence (φ D + φ R ) also increases. The dispersion constant (A) in φ D
            also increases with the magnetic susceptibility (χ), via the Kirkwood–M¨ uller
            formula (Eq. 2.9). Hence the dispersion energies are higher for the divalent ions.
            The induction energy, in contrast, decreases sharply with the increasing size,
            as stipulated by Eq. 7.1 (φ Ind ∝ r −4 ). Here, α is fixed, which is for argon. The
            divalent cations are slightly bigger but have twice the amount of charge, hence
            the induction energies with the divalent cations are much larger than those with
                                        2
            the monovalent cations (φ Ind ∝ q ).For N 2 and O 2 interacting with the same
            cation, the nonspecific (φ D + φ R )and φ Ind energies are about the same because
            their sizes, polarizabilities, and magnetic susceptibilities are quite similar. The
                                                                  because N 2 has
            main difference in the total interacting energies comes from φ ˙ FQ
            a much higher quadrupole moment than O 2 . The substantial differences among
                                                               +
                                         +
                                                   +
            the four pairs (O 2 − Li ,O 2 − Na ,N 2 − Li and N 2 − Na ) are clearly seen
                               +
                                                     +
                                             +
            in Table 7.5. For O 2 interacting with Li and Na , the difference of 12 kJ/mol
            is caused by the different sizes of the ions, hence the difference in the induction
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205