Page 344 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 344

Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH004.qxd  7/1/2006  6:54 PM  Page 340
                    340                                          4. Adsorption and Ion Exchange


                    where   V  f  is the effluent volume until the first appearance of the solute in the exit stream,
                    V  br  the effluent volume until breakpoint, and   V  tot  the effluent volume until the exit solute
                    concentration is equal to its inlet concentration.
                      The dependence of   q  o  on residence time has been noticed and modeled elsewhere, in the
                    case of zinc and acid dyes adsorption by bone char and acti respecti ated carbon, v o v ely (K
                    et al  ., 2002). The following equations were successfully applied:


                                            q  d o,be  o,ma x  q      1e  x p  res  t            (4.212)


                                                         p
                                                         x
                                            q  d o,be  x o,ma  q      1e   res  t        0.5      (4.213)
                    where   q  o,bed  and   q  o,max  are the bed maximum capacity and the real maximum capacity
                    (measured in batch reactor systems),  t  res  the residence time, and     a system-specific con-
                    stant. It is obvious that if the residence time is infinite, the bed maximum capacity is equal
                      ,
                         xpected,
                    to the real maximum capacity which is theoretically e as noted else where
                       v
                    (Inglezakis and Grigoropoulou, 2003).  These equations hae been also tested in Pb  2
                    adsorption by clinoptilolite (zeolite) and shoactory results (Inglezakis, 2002b).  wed satisf
                      In conclusion, the maximum adsorption capacity should be measured in fixed-bed experi-
                    fusion coefficients should  ments under dynamic conditions, and if models are applicable, dif
                    be also determined in fed-bed apparatus. Due to the fact that the equilibrium isotherms ix
                    require extended data series and thus are time-consuming experiments, the latter are quite dif-
                    ficult to be conducted in fixed-bed reactors and from this point of view, it is more practical to
                    evaluated equilibrium isotherms in batch reactor systems. Then, it is known that when apply-
                    ing fixed-bed models using an equilibrium isotherm obtained in batch-type experiments, the
                    equilibrium discrepancy (if it exists) can be compensated by a different estimate for the solid
                    diffusion coefficient (Inglezakis and Grigoropoulu, 2003; Weber and Wang, 1987).

                    Example 9
                    Wastewater containing 100 ppm Pb  2    and minor amounts of other ions has to be treated
                    able e (20°C). The maximum alloxit concentration is 10 ppm. The aailable adsorbent is w v
                    a zeolite of particle size 2 mm (  
   0.8), particle density 2 g/cm  3  , and bulk density 1
                                                S
                    g/cm  3  .  Suppose that solid diffusion is the controlling mechanism. Solid diffusion is meas-
                    ured and found to be about 10  –9  cm  2  /s. Furthermore, the system obeys the f a orable v
                    Langmuir isotherm with   La    0.1.  The MEL is   q  max    200 mg/g.  ailable amount of v The a
                    the zeolite is 100 kg.
                    (a)  Propose an optimum design for this operation by using an LDF model.
                    (b)  Compare the LDF model with Helfw operation and  s model for upflo ferich’  Q  rel    5
                         BV/h.

                    Solution
                    Model analysis  : The simple LDF model for solid diffusion control will be used, namely
                    eq. (4.141). For the specified system with   La   = 0.1, the   N ( T – 1) versus (  C / C ) is sho wn
                                                                   s               0
                    in Figure 4.34.
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349