Page 343 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 343

Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH004.qxd  7/1/2006  6:54 PM  Page 339
                  4.2 Design of Adsorption and Ion-Exchange Processes  339


                  diffusion control there is no effect of the linear velocity on the kinetics in the bed, while for
                   act,
                  film-diffusion control the kinetics will be affected. In f this is a scale-up procedure.
                  From these experiments, a loabo wer limit of the linear v elocity can be found,  v e which the
                  controlling mechanism is the solid diffusion control. Then, for higher linear v elocities,
                  which are expected in large-scale units, it is guaranteed that the controlling step is unaltered.

                  Derivation of basic experimental data
                  Experimentally, it is valuable to determine the following: the maximum adsorption capacity
                  of the solid (  q  max  ), the dificients of the solutes in the solid phase ( f fusion coef  D ), and the
                                                                                  s
                  equilibrium isotherm.  Theoretically the equilibrium isotherm, the maximum adsorption
                  ,
                  capacity, and the solid diffusion coefficient for a specific ion-exchange or adsorption system
                  are independent of the experimental method used for their determination and independent of
                  flow conditions (Helfferich, 1962; Lieu and Weber, 1981; Chen and Wang, 2004; Fernandez
                  et al  ., 1996). Ho e v er , we xchange and adsorption sys- xperimental results obtained in ion-e
                  tems showed that the maximum adsorption capacity measured in a fixed bed is different from
                  that measured in a batch system, and it might be flow-rate dependent (Inglezakis   et al  ., 2002;
                  Inglezakis and Grigoropoulou, 2003; Hlavay   et al  ., 1982; McKay and Bino, 1985; McLaren
                  and Farquhar, 1973; Netpradit   et al  ., 2004; K o   et al  ., 2003; Sen   et al  ., 2002). Furthermore,
                  as shown in the cases of adsorption on activated carbon and the removal of Cr (III) using zeo-
                  lite NaX, the equilibrium isotherm is influenced by the type of the reactor used for its meas-
                  urement (fixed-bed and batch reactor) (Weber and Wang, 1987; Barros   et al  ., 2006). Finally ,
                  the diffusion coefficient may be different when measured in fixed beds or batch systems, and
                  in some cases is found to be flow-dependent (Inglezakis and Grigoropoulou, 2003; Yoshida
                      eber and Smith,
                  et al  ., 1984; W 1987; McKay and Bino, 1985; K o    et al  ., 2003; Mark o vska
                  et al  ., 2001).  ations seem to be a result of the limiting (low) contact time in  All these observ
                  fixed beds and of the different concentration gradients in fed beds and batch reactors
                    ix
                  (Inglezakis and Grigoropoulou, 2003; Ko   et al  ., 2003). It must be recognized that batch reac-
                  ed-bed v tors do not approximate the hydrodynamic and contaminant remoal patterns of f ix
                  (column) reactors (Weber and Smith, 1987). Another reason responsible for such differences
                  between batch and fixed-bed parameters is the lack of adequate mechanical strength of par-
                  ticles (compressed particles due to flow pressure) and the permeability of particles to fluid
                  flow (Fernandez   et al  , ., 1996). Ob viously  this case is possible only when resins are used.
                    The maximum adsorption (or ion-exchange) and breakthrough capacity can be meas-
                  ured using the experimental breakthrough curve (  C v ersus   V  eff  ) by integration (Perry and
                  Green, 1999; Helf 1962): ferich,
                                                  V tot       
                                              V      ∫  X V (  V ) d  C  
                                                tot  eff  eff     o             (4.210)
                                         q  o      V f
                                                       bo V
                                                  V br        
                                               V     ∫  X V (  V ) d  C  
                                                 br   eff  eff     o            (4.211)
                                         q  br  =   V f
                                                       bo V
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348