Page 216 - Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures
P. 216

Example of a Steel Frame Building With Masonry Infill Walls Chapter  4 209


                 Q s ¼action caused by effective snow load, which is assumed to be zero in
                 this example.

             (2) Where the effects or actions of gravity loads and seismic forces counteract
                 each other, the action caused by gravity loads, Q G , shall be obtained in
                 accordance with Eq. (4.3):
                                        Q G ¼ 0:9Q D                    (4.3)
                The demands should be compared with the lower-bound capacity of the
             frame members. Acceptance criteria for force-controlled actions in components
             shall satisfy Eq. (4.4):

                                        κQ CL  > Q UF                   (4.4)
             where:
                Q CL ¼lower-bound strength of a force-controlled action of an element at the
                deformation level under consideration;
                Q UF ¼force-controlled action caused by gravity loads in combination with
                earthquake forces; and
                κ¼knowledge factor which is assumed to be 1.0 because the usual level of
                knowledge exists about the example buildings including material properties,
                as-built sketches, etc. According to the Instruction for Seismic Rehabilita-
                tion of Existing Buildings (Code 360) [10], the target performance level
                of the building is considered to be “Life Safety” (LS) and the level of
                knowledge is “Preferred.” As a result, the knowledge factor of the building
                is 1.00.
             The results of the analysis show that the frame alone is adequate for tolerating
             the load combinations due to gravity loads.


             4.4.1.2  Walls
             All the walls in the building are made of solid bricks with sand-cement
             mortar; they are hence classified as infill walls according to ICERIFB [2]
             (Fig. 4.10).


             4.4.1.3  Mechanical Properties of Brickwork
             According to ASCE 41 [1], the condition of masonry can be classified into three
             groups:
             l Good condition: masonry found during condition assessment to have mortar
                and units intact, with no visible cracking.
             l Fair condition: masonry found during condition assessment to have mortar
                and units intact, but with minor cracking.
             l Poor condition: masonry found during condition assessment to have
                degraded mortar, degraded masonry units, or significant cracking.
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221